Cell Reports MethodsSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Systematic integration of protein affecting mutations, gene fusions, and copy number alterations into a comprehensive somatic mutational profile
Shawn S Striker, Sierra F. WilferdiD, Erika M. LewisiD, Samantha A. O’ConnoriD, Christopher L. PlaisieriD
Abstract
Somatic mutations occur as random genetic changes in genes through protein-affecting mutations (PAMs), gene fusions, or copy number alterations (CNAs). Mutations of different types can have a similar phenotypic effect (i.e., allelic heterogeneity) and should be integrated into a unified gene mutation profile. We developed OncoMerge to fill this niche of integrating somatic mutations to capture allelic heterogeneity, assign a function to mutations, and overcome known obstacles in cancer genetics. Application of OncoMerge to the TCGA Pan-Cancer Atlas increased the number and frequency of somatically mutated genes and improved the prediction of the somatic mutation role as either activating or loss of function. Using integrated somatic mutation matrices increased the power to infer gene regulatory networks and uncovered the enrichment of switch-like feedback motifs and delay-inducing feed-forward loops. These studies demonstrate that OncoMerge efficiently integrates PAMs, fusions, and CNAs and strengthens downstream analyses linking somatic mutations to cancer phenotypes. MotivationGenes are mutated in tumors through either PAMs, CNAs, or gene fusions, thereby splitting the signal of the somatic mutation effect across these three mutation types. We developed OncoMerge to systematically integrate the three mutation types into a single mutation profile that better captures the impact of somatic mutations on cancer phenotypes. As a tool OncoMerge fills the gap between the sophisticated variant calling pipelines and downstream analyses.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Field percentile
- top 45%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Applying expression profile similarity for discovery of patient-specific functional mutations
Guofeng Meng·MicroarraysPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2018
- An integrative somatic mutation analysis to identify pathways linked with survival outcomes across 19 cancer types
Sunho Park, Seung-Jun Kim, … Tae Hyun Hwang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2016
- An integrative approach uncovers genes with perturbed interactions in cancers
Shilpa N. Kobren, Bernard Chazelle, Mona Singh·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2019
- Widespread redundancy in -omics profiles of cancer mutation states
Jake Crawford, Brock C. Christensen, … Casey S. Greene·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2021
- The cumulative impact of passenger mutations on cancer development
Akshatha Nayak, Candace S. Y. Chan, … Ilias Georgakopoulos‐Soares·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2026
- Genomic foundation model-derived disruption profiling links somatic mutations to cancer biology and clinical outcomes
Akshatha Nayak, Tae-Rim Lee, … Ilias Georgakopoulos‐Soares·medRxiv·Sep 16, 2026