The American Journal of Human GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Joint testing of rare variant burden scores using non-negative least squares
Andrey ZiyatdinoviD, Joelle S. MbatchouiD, Anthony MarckettaiD, Joshua BackmaniD, Sheila M. GaynoriD, Yuxin ZouiD, Tyler JosephiD, Benjamin J. GeraghtyiD, Joseph HermaniD, Kyoko WatanabeiD, Arkopravo GhoshiD, Jack A. KosmickiiD, Adam E. LockeiD, Timothy A. ThorntoniD, Hyun Min KangiD, Manuel A. R. FerreiraiD, Aris BarasiD, Gonçalo R. AbecasisiD, Jonathan MarchiniiD
Abstract
Gene-based burden tests are a popular and powerful approach for analysis of exome-wide association studies. These approaches combine sets of variants within a gene into a single burden score that is then tested for association. Typically, a range of burden scores are calculated and tested across a range of annotation classes and frequency bins. Correlation between these tests can complicate the multiple testing correction and hamper interpretation of the results. We introduce a new method called the Sparse Burden Association Test (SBAT) that tests the joint set of burden scores under the assumption that causal burden scores act in the same effect direction. The method simultaneously assesses the significance of the model fit and selects the set of burden scores that best explain the association at the same time. Using simulated data, we show that the method is well calibrated and highlight some scenarios where the test outperforms existing gene-based tests. We apply the method to 73 quantitative traits from the UK Biobank which further illustrates the power of the method. This test is implemented in the REGENIE software.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Testing Rare-Variant Association without Calling Genotypes Allows for Systematic Differences in Sequencing between Cases and Controls
Yi-Juan Hu, Peizhou Liao, … Glen Satten·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2016
- KS-Burden: Assessing distributional differences of rare variants in dichotomous traits
Robert M. Porsch, Timothy Shin Heng Mak, … Pak Chung Sham·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2018
- An exact, unifying framework for region-based association testing in family-based designs, including higher criticism approaches, SKATs, multivariate and burden tests
Julian Hecker, F. William Townes, … Christoph Lange·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Rare variants association testing for a binary outcome when pooling individual level data from heterogeneous studies
Tamar Sofer, Na Guo·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2020
- Local ancestry-informed rare variant burden testing improves gene discovery in admixed populations
Pragati Kore, Taotao Tan, … Elizabeth G. Atkinson·medRxiv·Jul 15, 2026
- Flexibly Modeling Rare Variant Pathogenicity Improves Gene Discovery for Complex Traits
Jeremy Schwartzentruber, Petko P. Fiziev, … Kyle Kai‐How Farh·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2025