Consciousness and CognitionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Punishing temporal judgement boosts sense of agency and modulates its underlying neural correlates
Abstract
Feeling in control of ones actions is fundamental to the formation of action-outcome relationships. Reinforcement and its valence also change the action-outcome relationship, either through behavior promotion or diminishment. In this study we evaluated how reward and punishment reinforcement modulate sense of agency, as measured by intentional binding. Moreover, using electroencephalography (EEG) we evaluated how reward and punishment reinforcement changes outcome event related potentials associated with the accuracy of participants judgement of the time interval between a key press and audio tone. We found that punishment reinforcement increased intentional binding between the action and outcome more than reward and control feedback. This was also reflected in the outcome event related potentials, where punishment elicited greater P300s and Late Positive Potentials compared to reward and control. We also found increased N100s and diminished P300s and Late Positive Potentials when the participants did not actively participate in evoking the tone. Taken together, our findings showcase that punishment reinforcement boosts sense of agency and modulates associated neural activity more than reward and no reinforcement, as a function of increasing attention and arousal. These findings illuminate the greater effect punishment reinforcement has on behavior and brain activity by its modification of sense of agency, which is important for the development of treatments in psychiatric and neurological diseases.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Value control of punishment
Felipe I. Varas, Anthony Dickinson, Omar David Perez·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2026
- Reward positivity biases interval production in a continuous timing task
Yan Yan, Laurence Tudor Hunt, Cameron Dale Hassall·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2023
- No evidence in favour of the existence of 'intentional' binding
Gaiqing Kong, Cheryne Aberkane, … Marine Vernet·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2023
- Absence of electroencephalographic evidence of implicit action-effect intentional binding with varying effect probability
Max Seignette, Mark Schram Christensen·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2020
- Compress global, dilate local: Intentional binding in action-outcome alternations
Shu Imaizumi, Yoshihiko Tanno, Hiroshi Imamizu·Consciousness and CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2019
- EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning
Dimitrios J. Palidis, Paul L. Gribble·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020