Cross-chemical and cross-species toxicity prediction: benchmarkingand a novel 3D-structure-based deep learning model
Abstract
Prediction of a compounds toxicity is a key step toward realizing animal-free testing of chemical compounds. Recent advances have yielded significant progress in computational toxicity prediction, including machine learning methods that utilize chemical fingerprints and deep learning-based latent representations. However, challenges remain, primarily due to the lack of clean training datasets and the inconsistent model performance. To address these challenges, we curated a comprehensive dataset of aquatic toxicity from seven data sources, which contains 50,603 records for 5,889 compounds across 2,285 different species, much larger than similar datasets used in previous studies. We also developed tox-learn, a Python library featuring tools for automated dataset cleaning, machine learning methods and performance evaluation. The library places special emphasis on avoiding overestimation of prediction accuracy caused by improper train-test data splitting. Based on this toolbox, we benchmarked various predictive models using different train-test splitting strategies on the curated dataset. Our results showed that the choice of machine learning method, molecular fingerprint, and train-test splitting strategy all significantly affect performance. We demonstrated that incorporating species information generally improved predictions, although the degree of improvement depended on how this information was represented. In addition, we developed a new 3D structure-based deep-learning model, 3DMol-Tox, which achieves regression accuracy comparable to the best 2D-structure based model (GPBoost) while exhibiting consistently higher within-one-bin (W1B) classification accuracy. Finally, we analyzed the impact of different train-test splitting strategies and provide recommendations based on our benchmarking, such as using structure-aware splitting to mitigate information leakage, a common issue that inflates reported model performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Machine Learning for Toxicity Prediction in Low-Sample Molecular Classes
Carlos Barajas, Laura J. Dunphy, … Evan Lloyd·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- Toxicity Prediction Tools Do Not Generalize to Novel Chemistry
Martin Weiss, Circe Hsu, … Antonio H. O. Fonseca·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2026
- Transformers enable accurate prediction of acute and chronic chemical toxicity in aquatic organisms
M. Gustavsson, S. Kall, … E. Kristiansson·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2023
- NoiTox: A Machine Learning Strategy for Peptide Toxicity Prediction Reveals Label Noise in Benchmark Datasets
Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida, Matheus C. Albuquerque, … Sabrina de Azevedo Silveira·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2026
- ToxiVerse: A Public Platform for Chemical Toxicity Data Sharing and Customizable Predictive Modeling
Prasannavenkatesh Durai, Daniel P. Russo, … Hao Zhu·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2026
- A Benchmark Dataset for Machine Learning in Ecotoxicology
Christoph Schür, Lilian Gasser, … Marco Baity‐Jesi·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Oct 18, 2023