Neural Fingerprinting based on Brain Network Dynamics: A Cross-Platform MEG Study
Anna Yasmin Beer, Chetan GohiliD, Zoe Tanner, Lukas RieriD, Ryan M. HilliD, Niall HolmesiD, Daniel Ferring, Vishal ShahiD, Mark W. WoolrichiD, Matthew J. BrookesiD
Abstract
Neural fingerprinting seeks to identify individuals based on measurements of brain activity, exploiting the fact that aspects of brain function unique to an individual remain stable across repeated scans. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful technique for fingerprinting. However, most MEG studies have used conventional (SQUID-based) MEG technology and typically rely on data aggregated over time, overlooking the rich temporal dynamics available in MEG. Here, using SQUID-MEG and the more recently introduced OPM-MEG, we showed fingerprinting was possible within and between modalities using static (time-aggregated) features; this is consistent with previous work. We further asked whether fingerprinting was possible based on network dynamics, estimated using a canonical hidden Markov model (CHMM). Results showed that the CHMM-derived networks provide a better fit to SQUID data than to OPM data; however, this effect was small and to be expected given the canonical networks were trained on SQUID data. We further showed that fingerprinting was possible within and between modalities using CHMM-derived state activation time courses and state power spectral densities. However, state summary statistics and transition probabilities only supported within modality fingerprinting. Our findings suggest that subject-specific information is preserved within CHMM states and across MEG technologies. This represents an important step towards advancing our understanding of brain dynamics, and particularly the brain networks delineated by the CHMM. The study also supports the future use of the CHMM for processing and interpretation of OPM-MEG data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: evaluation, pitfalls and interpretations
Ekansh Sareen, Sélima Zahar, … Enrico Amico·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2021
- Robust sub-network fingerprints of brief signals in the MEGfunctional connectome for single-patient classification
Vasiles Balabanis, Jiaxiang Zhang, … Su Yang·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2024
- The influence of the head model on magnetoencephalography-derived functional connectivity fingerprinting
Matthias Schelfhout, Thomas Hinault, … Daniele Marinazzo·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2024
- fMRI and MEG Fingerprints Diverge at the Individual Level
Brian Zhaoyi Mo, Stephen M. Smith, Mark W. Woolrich·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- High-Accuracy Machine Learning Techniques for Functional Connectome Fingerprinting and Cognitive State Decoding
Andrew Hannum, Mario Alberto Lopez, … Richard F. Betzel·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2023
- MEG, myself, and I: individual identification from neurophysiological brain activity
Jason da Silva Castanheira, Hector Domingo Orozco Perez, … Sylvain Baillet·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2021