Frontiers in NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Modeling dynamic allocation of effort in a sequential task using discounting models
Darío Cuevas RiveraiD, Alexander StrobeliD, Thomas GoschkeiD, Stefan J. KiebeliD
Abstract
Most rewards in our lives require effort to obtain them. It is known that effort is seen by humans as carrying an intrinsic disutility which devalues the obtainable reward. Established models for effort discounting account for this by using participant-specific discounting parameters inferred from experiments. These parameters offer only a static glance into the bigger picture of effort exertion. The mechanism underlying the dynamic changes in a participants willingness to exert effort is still unclear and an active topic of research. Here, we modeled dynamic effort exertion as a consequence of effort- and probability-discounting mechanisms during goal reaching, sequential behavior. To do this, we developed a novel sequential decision-making task in which participants make binary choices to reach a minimum number of points. Importantly, the time points and circumstances of effort allocation are decided by participants according to their own preferences and not imposed directly by the task. Using the computational model to analyze participants choices, we show that the dynamics of effort exertion arise from a combination of changing task needs and forward planning. In other words, the interplay between a participants inferred discounting parameters is sufficient to explain the dynamic allocation of effort during goal reaching. Using formal model comparison, we also infer the forward-planning strategy used by participants. The model allows us to characterize a participants effort exertion in terms of only a few parameters. Moreover, the model can be adapted to a number of tasks used in establishing the neural underpinnings of forward-planning behavior and meta-control, allowing for the characterization of behavior in terms of model parameters.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Field percentile
- 42th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Worth the work? Monkeys discount rewards by a subjective adapting effort cost
Mark Burrell, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Wolfram Schultz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2023
- A common deliberative process underlies model-based planning and patient intertemporal choice
L. E. Hunter, A. M. Bornstein, C. A. Hartley·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2018
- Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control
Xiamin Leng, Debbie Marianne Yee, … Amitai Shenhav·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 28, 2021
- Dissecting the contribution of recent reward versus recent performance history on cognitive effort allocation
Floortje S. Spronkers, Renée S. Koolschijn, … Hanneke E.M. den Ouden·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2026
- Mental Effort Cost Learning is Retrospective
Asako Mitsuto Nagase, Rei Akaishi, … Andrew Westbrook·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2022
- Efficient decision-makers evaluate relative reward per effort
J. Kubanek·bioRxiv·May 31, 2022