henhaobio
Sign in

DevelopmentDevelopmental BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Collective signalling drives rapid jumping between cell states

Elizabeth R. WestbrookiD, Tchern LenniD, Jonathan Robert ChubbiD, Vlatka AntolovićiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Development can proceed in "fits and starts", with rapid transitions between cell states involving concerted transcriptome-wide changes in gene expression. However, it is not clear how these transitions are regulated in complex cell populations, in which cells receive multiple inputs. It is also not clear to what extent these rapid transitions represent developmental commitment. Here we address these issues using Dictyostelium cells undergoing development in their physiological niche. A continuous single cell transcriptomics time series reveals a sharp "jump" in global gene expression marking functionally different cell states. By simultaneously live imaging the physiological dynamics of transcription and signalling over millimetre length scales, we show that the jump coincides with the onset of collective oscillations of cAMP, the positive feedback signal for multicellular development. Different jump genes respond to distinct dynamic features of signalling. The late gene expression changes of the jump are almost completely dependent on cAMP. In contrast, transcript changes at the onset of the jump require additional input. The spatial boundary marking the jump divides cells separated by only a few minutes of developmental time, with cells missing a jump then waiting several hours for the onset of the next wave of cAMP oscillations. This timing variability contrasts the prevailing developmental paradigm of a timed synchronous process and is associated with substantial pre-jump transcriptome variability. The coupling of collective signalling with gene expression is a potentially powerful strategy to drive robust cell state transitions in heterogeneous signalling environments. Based on the context of the jump, we also conclude that sharp gene expression transitions may not be sufficient for commitment.

Citations
13
FWCI
1.15
Field percentile
top 24%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.