Expert-led priorities for a response diversity research agenda in ecology
Samuel R. P.‐J. RossiD, Ceres BarrosiD, Laura E. DeeiD, Mike S. FowleriD, Owen L. PetcheyiD, T. SasakiiD, Hannah J. WhiteiD, Anna LoPrestiiD
Abstract
Response diversity aims to capture and explain the variation in ecological responses to environmental change. Response diversity is expected to drive ecological stability since a wider variety of responses to one or more environmental factors should stabilise fluctuations of ecosystem functions. However, uptake of empirical response diversity research has been slow. Here we assess current thinking around response diversity by conducting a targeted expert survey of response diversity researchers. Our survey revealed that one barrier to a unified research agenda on response diversity is the lack of agreement among respondents on the definition of response diversity, and to which dimension(s) of ecological stability response diversity might relate. When asked to select the temporal, spatial, and biological scales at which response diversity may be most relevant for ecological stability, respondents chose a wide range of scales indicating differences in how experts view response diversitys stabilising effect. Respondents considered studies incorporating both biotic interactions and abiotic environmental responses to be especially challenging, as were those thinking about responses to multiple environmental changes simultaneously. Moreover, respondents thought inconsistencies in the definitions of, and methods for measuring, response diversity were a major challenge facing the field. Despite these barriers, the survey revealed a desire for globally coordinated research efforts on response diversity in the form of syntheses, workshops, and distributed experiments, but that a standardised response diversity metric across diverse use-cases could be too restrictive. Our findings suggest we can shift response diversity from a loose collection of conceptual studies and inconsistent empirical applications towards a quantitative and coordinated research programme mechanistically linking biodiversity and ecological stability. As such, we are launching the Response Diversity Network--a research community interested in the science and application of response diversity-- whose activities we hope will benefit both individual studies of response diversity and globally coordinated research efforts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How to measure response diversity
S. R. P.-J. Ross, O. L. Petchey, … D. W. Armitage·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2023
- Response diversity can stabilize or destabilize community dynamics depending on the number of insensitive species
Shota Shibasaki, Hiroaki Fujita, … Masato Yamamichi·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2026
- Response diversity in the context of multifarious environmental change
F. Polazzo, R. Limberger, … O. Petchey·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2023
- Response diversity is a major driver of temporal stability in complex food webs
Alain Danet, Sonia Kéfi, … Andrew P. Beckerman·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Response diversity is key to buffer ecosystem productivity against multiple environmental change drivers
S. Tatsumi, N. Punwasi, … M. W. Cadotte·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2023
- Response diversity increases functional stability but decreases diversity and compositional stability of grassland communities
Manuel Pitzer, Vincent Zieschank, … Robert R. Junker·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2026