Task-irrelevant visual forms facilitate covert and overt spatial selection
Abstract
Covert and overt spatial selection behaviors are guided by both visual saliency maps derived from early visual features as well as priority maps reflecting high-level cognitive factors. However, whether mid-level perceptual processes associated with visual form recognition contribute to covert and overt spatial selection behaviors remains unclear. We hypothesized that if peripheral visual forms contribute to spatial selection behaviors, then they should do so even when the visual forms are task-irrelevant. We tested this hypothesis in male and female human subjects as well as in male macaque monkeys performing a visual detection task. In this task, subjects reported the detection of a supra-threshold target spot presented on top of one of two peripheral images, and they did so with either a speeded manual button press (humans) or a speeded saccadic eye movement response (humans and monkeys). Crucially, the two images, one with a visual form and the other with a partially phase-scrambled visual form, were completely irrelevant to the task. In both manual (covert) and oculomotor (overt) response modalities, and in both humans and monkeys, response times were faster when the target was congruent with a visual form than when it was incongruent. Importantly, incongruent targets were associated with almost all errors, suggesting that forms automatically captured selection behaviors. These findings demonstrate that mid-level perceptual processes associated with visual form recognition contribute to covert and overt spatial selection. This indicates that neural circuits associated with target selection, such as the superior colliculus, may have privileged access to visual form information. Significance statementSpatial selection of visual information either with (overt) or without (covert) foveating eye movements is critical to primate behavior. However, it is still not clear whether spatial maps in sensorimotor regions known to guide overt and covert spatial selection are influenced by peripheral visual forms. We probed the ability of humans and monkeys to perform overt and covert target selection in the presence of spatially congruent or incongruent visual forms. Even when completely task-irrelevant, images of visual objects had a dramatic effect on target selection, acting much like spatial cues used in spatial attention tasks. Our results demonstrate that traditional brain circuits for orienting behaviors, such as the superior colliculus, likely have privileged access to visual object representations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Field percentile
- top 24%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Covert spatial attention speeds target individuation
Joshua J. Foster, Emma M. Bsales, Edward Awh·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2020
- Preserved recognition of basic visual features despite lack of awareness of shape: evidence from a case of neglect
Seda Akbıyık, Teresa Schubert, Alfonso Caramazza·bioRxiv·May 30, 2023
- Object-based attentional selection emerges late in visual cortical hierarchy for objects of varying perceptual strengths
Shahd Al‐Janabi, Nofar Strommer, … Adam S. Greenberg·bioRxiv·May 10, 2020
- Conceptual content in images triggers rapid shifts of covert attention
Brad Wyble, Michael Hess, … Charles L. Folk·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2018
- How spatial attention alters visual cortical representation during target anticipation
Ekin Tünçok, Marisa Carrasco, Jonathan A. Winawer·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2024
- Dorsal pulvinar inactivation leads to spatial selection bias without perceptual deficit
Kristin Kaduk, Melanie Wilke, Igor Kagan·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2022