Robust, flexible, and scalable tests for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium across diverse ancestries
Alan M. KwongiD, Thomas W. BlackwelliD, Jonathon LeFaiveiD, Mariza de AndradeiD, John BarnardiD, Kathleen C. BarnesiD, John BlangeroiD, Eric BoerwinkleiD, Esteban G. BurchardiD, Brian E. CadeiD, Daniel I. ChasmaniD, Han CheniD, Matthew P. ConomosiD, L. Adrienne CupplesiD, Patrick T. EllinoriD, Celeste S. EngiD, Yan Lin GaoiD, Xiuqing GuoiD, Marguerite R. IrviniD, Tanika N. KellyiD, Wonji KimiD, Charles L KooperbergiD, Steven A. LubitziD, Angel C. Y. MakiD, Ani W ManichaikuliD, , Hyun Min KangiD
Abstract
Traditional Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) tests (the {chi}2 test and the exact test) have long been used as a metric for evaluating genotype quality, as technical artifacts leading to incorrect genotype calls often can be identified as deviations from HWE. However, in datasets comprised of individuals from diverse ancestries, HWE can be violated even without genotyping error, complicating the use of HWE testing to assess genotype data quality. In this manuscript, we present the Robust Unified Test for HWE (RUTH) to test for HWE while accounting for population structure and genotype uncertainty, and evaluate the impact of population heterogeneity and genotype uncertainty on the standard HWE tests and alternative methods using simulated and real sequence datasets. Our results demonstrate that ignoring population structure or genotype uncertainty in HWE tests can inflate false positive rates by many orders of magnitude. Our evaluations demonstrate different tradeoffs between false positives and statistical power across the methods, with RUTH consistently amongst the best across all evaluations. RUTH is implemented as a practical and scalable software tool to rapidly perform HWE tests across millions of markers and hundreds of thousands of individuals while supporting standard VCF/BCF formats. RUTH is publicly available at https://www.github.com/statgen/ruth.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Extending Tests of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium to Structured Populations
Wei Hao, John D. Storey·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2019
- Testing for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium in Structured Populations using NGS Data
Jonas Meisner, Anders Albrechtsen·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2019
- Efficient test for deviation from Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium with known or ambiguous typing in highly polymorphic loci
Or Shkuri, Sapir Israeli, … Yoram Louzoun·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2024
- Hardy Weinberg Exact Test In Large Scale Variant Calling Quality Control
Zhuoyi Huang, Navin Rustagi, … Fuli Yu·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2016
- Leveraging Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for association testing in case-control studies
Lin Zhang, Lisa J. Strug, Lei Sun·The Annals of Applied StatisticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2023
- A General Statistical Framework for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Inference on the X Chromosome
Lin Zhang, Andrew D. Paterson, Lei Sun·bioRxiv·May 20, 2026