DROP: Molecular voucher database for identification of Drosophila parasitoids
Chia‐Hua LueiD, Matthew L. BuffingtoniD, Sonja J. SchefferiD, Matthew L. LewisiD, Tyler A. ElliottiD, Amelia R. I. LindseyiD, Amy C. DriskelliD, Anna Jandova, Masahito T. KimuraiD, Y. Carton, Robert R. KulaiD, Todd A. SchlenkeiD, Mariana MateosiD, Shubha GovindiD, Julien VaraldiiD, Emilio GuerrieriiD, Massimo GiorginiiD, Xingeng WangiD, Kim Alan HoelmeriD, Kent M. DaaneiD, Paul K. AbramiD, Nicholas A. PardikesiD, Joel J. BrowniD, Mélanie ThierryiD, Marylène PoiriéiD, , Jan HrčekiD
Abstract
Molecular identification is increasingly used to speed up biodiversity surveys and laboratory experiments. However, many groups of organisms cannot be reliably identified using standard databases such as GenBank or BOLD due to lack of sequenced voucher specimens identified by experts. Sometimes a large number of sequences are available, but with too many errors to allow identification. Here we address this problem for parasitoids of Drosophila by introducing a curated open-access molecular reference database, DROP (Drosophila parasitoids). Identifying Drosophila parasitoids is challenging and poses a major impediment to realize the full potential of this model system in studies ranging from molecular mechanisms to food webs, and in biological control of Drosophila suzukii. In DROP (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519656), genetic data are linked to voucher specimens and, where possible, the voucher specimens are identified by taxonomists and vetted through direct comparison with primary type material. To initiate DROP, we curated 154 laboratory strains, 856 vouchers, 554 DNA sequences, 16 genomes, 14 transcriptomes, and 6 proteomes drawn from a total of 183 operational taxonomic units (OTUs): 114 described Drosophila parasitoid species and 69 provisional species. We found species richness of Drosophila parasitoids to be heavily underestimated and provide an updated taxonomic catalogue for the community. DROP offers accurate molecular identification and improves cross-referencing between individual studies that we hope will catalyze research on this diverse and fascinating model system. Our effort should also serve as an example for researchers facing similar molecular identification problems in other groups of organisms.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A method for sampling parasitized Drosophila suzukii puparia from soil
C. Capko, J. Thiessen, … P. K. Abram·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2023
- DrosoPhyla: genomic resources for drosophilid phylogeny and systematics
C. Finet, V. A. Kassner, … F. Marletaz·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2021
- DNA barcodes and reliable molecular identifications in a diverse group of invasive pests: lessons from Bactrocera fruit flies on variation across the COI gene, introgression, and standardization
C. Doorenweerd, M. San Jose, … D. Rubinoff·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2020
- The flower flies and the unknown diversity of Drosophilidae (Diptera): a biodiversity inventory in the Brazilian fauna
H. J. Schmitz, V. L. d. S. Valente·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2018
- Efficient k-mer based curation of raw sequence data: application in Drosophila suzukii
Mathieu Gautier·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2023
- Olfactory responses of Drosophila suzukii parasitoids to chemical cues from SWD-infested
F. Trinanes, A. Gonzalez Ritzel, G. J. de la vega·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2022