Removing reference bias and improving indel calling in ancient DNA data analysis by mapping to a sequence variation graph
Rui MartinianoiD, Erik P. GarrisoniD, Eppie R. JonesiD, Andrea ManicaiD, Richard Michael DurbiniD
Abstract
BackgroundDuring the last decade, the analysis of ancient DNA (aDNA) sequence has become a powerful tool for the study of past human populations. However, the degraded nature of aDNA means that aDNA molecules are short and frequently mutated by post-mortem chemical modifications. These features decrease read mapping accuracy and increase reference bias, in which reads containing non-reference alleles are less likely to be mapped than those containing reference alleles. Recently, alternative approaches for read mapping and genetic variation analysis have been developed that replace the linear reference by a variation graph which includes known alternative variants at each genetic locus. Here, we evaluate the use of variation graph software vg to avoid reference bias for ancient DNA and compare our approach to existing methods. ResultsWe used vg to align simulated and real aDNA samples to a variation graph containing 1000 Genome Project variants, and compared these with the same data aligned with bwa to the human linear reference genome. We show that use of vg leads to a balanced allelic representation at polymorphic sites, effectively removing reference bias, and more sensitive variant detection in comparison with bwa, especially for insertions and deletions (indels). Alternative approaches that use relaxed bwa parameter settings or filter bwa alignments can also reduce bias, but can have lower sensitivity than vg, particularly for indels. ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that aligning aDNA sequences to variation graphs effectively mitigates the impact of reference bias when analysing aDNA, while retaining mapping sensitivity and allowing detection of variation, in particular indel variation, that was previously missed.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 128
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pre-processing of paleogenomes: Mitigating reference bias and postmortem damage in ancient genome data
Dilek Koptekin, Etka Yapar, … Mehmet Somel·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2025
- Sequence variation aware genome references and read mapping with the variation graph toolkit
Erik P. Garrison, Jouni Sirén, … Richard Michael Durbin·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2018
- Population-specific genome graphs improve high-throughput sequencing data analysis: A case study on the Pan-African genome
Huseyin Serhat Tetikol, Kübra Narcı, … Brandi N. Davis‐Dusenbery·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- The presence and impact of reference bias on population genomic studies of prehistoric human populations
Torsten Günther, Carl Nettelblad·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2019
- Reducing reference bias using multiple population reference genomes
Nae-Chyun Chen, Brad Solomon, … Ben Langmead·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2021
- Bovine breed-specific augmented reference graphs facilitate accurate sequence read mapping and unbiased variant discovery
Danang Crysnanto, Hubert Pausch·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2020