PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Integration and evaluation of magnetic stimulation in physiology setups
Malte T. AhlersiD, Christoph T. Block, Michael Winklhofer AiD, Martin GreschneriD
Abstract
A large number of behavioral experiments have demonstrated the existence of a magnetic sense in many animal species. Further, studies with immediate gene expression markers have identified putative brain regions involved in magnetic information processing. In contrast, very little is known about the physiology of the magnetic sense and how the magnetic field is neuronally encoded. In vivo electrophysiological studies reporting neuronal correlates of the magnetic sense either have turned out to be irreproducible for lack of appropriate artifact controls or still await independent replication. Thus far, the research field of magnetoreception has little exploited the power of ex vivo physiological studies, which hold great promise for enabling stringent controls. However, tight space constraints in a recording setup and the presence of magnetizable materials in setup components and microscope objectives make it demanding to generate well-defined magnetic stimuli at the location of the biological specimen. Here, we present a solution based on a miniature vector magnetometer, a coil driver, and a calibration routine for the coil system to compensate for magnetic distortions in the setup. The magnetometer fits in common physiology recording chambers and has a sufficiently small spatial integration area to allow for probing spatial inhomogeneities. The coil-driver allows for the generation of defined non-stationary fast changing magnetic stimuli. Our ex vivo multielectrode array recordings from avian retinal ganglion cells show that artifacts induced by rapid magnetic stimulus changes can mimic the waveform of biological spikes on single electrodes. However, induction artifacts can be separated clearly from biological responses if the spatio-temporal characteristics of the artifact on multiple electrodes is taken into account. We provide the complete hardware design data and software resources for the integrated magnetic stimulation system.
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Field percentile
- top 37%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- In vivo magnetic recording of single-neuron action potentials
Frederike J. Klein, Patrick Jendritza, … Pascal Fries·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2023
- In vivo magnetic recording of neuronal activity
Laure Caruso, Thomas Wunderle, … Myriam Pannetier-Lecoeur·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2017
- Revaluation of magnetic properties of Magneto, MagR and αGFP-TRPV1/GFP-ferritin
Guangfu Wang, Peng Zhang, … J. Julius Zhu·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2019
- MRI Powered and Triggered Current Stimulator for Concurrent Stimulation and MRI
R. Mandal, N. B. Babaria, … Z. Liu·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2019
- Micromagnetic Stimulation (μMS) Dose-Response of the Rat Sciatic Nerve
R. Saha, Z. Sanger, … J.-P. Wang·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2022
- Magnetic actuation of otoliths allows behavioral and brain-wide neuronal exploration of vestibulo-motor processing in larval zebrafish.
Natalia Beiza-Canelo, Hippolyte Moulle, … Volker Bormuth·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2023