Human Brain MappingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Neuroanatomically-Based Age Prediction in Youth
Amirhossein ModabberniaiD, Heather Clare WhalleyiD, David C. GlahniD, Paul M. ThompsoniD, René S. KahniD, Sophia FrangouiD
Abstract
Application of machine learning algorithms to structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data has yielded behaviorally meaningful estimates of the biological age of the brain (brain-age). The choice of the machine learning approach in estimating brain-age in children and adolescents is important because age-related brain changes in these age-groups are dynamic. However, the comparative performance of the multiple machine learning algorithms available has not been systematically appraised. To address this gap, the present study evaluated the accuracy (Mean Absolute Error; MAE) and computational efficiency of 21 machine learning algorithms using sMRI data from 2,105 typically developing individuals aged 5 to 22 years from five cohorts. The trained models were then tested in two independent holdout datasets, comprising 4,078 pre-adolescents aged 9-10 years and another sample of 594 individuals aged 5-21 years. The algorithms encompassed parametric and nonparametric, Bayesian, linear and nonlinear, tree-based, and kernel-based models. Sensitivity analyses were performed for parcellation scheme, number of neuroimaging input features, number of cross-validation folds, number of extreme outliers, and sample size. The best performing algorithms were Extreme Gradient Boosting (MAE of 1.49), Random Forest Regression (MAE of 1.58) and Support Vector Regression with Radial Basis Function Kernel (MAE of 1.64) which had acceptable and comparable computational efficiency. Findings of the present study could be used as a guide for optimizing methodology when quantifying age-related changes in youth.
- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- BrainAGE: Revisited and reframed machine learning workflow
Polona Kalc, Robert Dahnke, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2024
- Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of accuracy and test-retest reliability of publicly available software packages
Ruben P. Dörfel, Joan M. Arenas‐Gomez, … Pontus Plavén‐Sigray·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2023
- Brain-age prediction: a systematic comparison of machine learning workflows
Shammi More, Georgios Antonopoulos, … the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 16, 2023
- Predicting Brain Age Using Structural Neuroimaging and Deep Learning
Y. Varatharajah, S. Baradwaj, … K. Kohlhoff·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2018
- Probing Multiple Algorithms to Calculate Brain Age: Examining Reliability, Relations with Demographics, and Predictive Power
Eva Bacas, Isabella Kahhalé, … Jamie Lars Hanson·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2023
- Brain age prediction in schizophrenia: does the choice of machine learning algorithm matter?
Won Hee Lee, Mathilde Antoniades, … Sophia Frangou·Psychiatry Research NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2021