The Hidden Side Of Diversity: Effects Of Imperfect Detection On Multiple Dimensions Of Biodiversity
Abstract
O_LIStudies on ecological communities often address patterns of species distribution and abundance, but few consider uncertainty in counts of both species and individuals when computing diversity measures. C_LIO_LIWe evaluated the extent to which imperfect detection may influence patterns of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity in ecological communities. C_LIO_LIWe estimated the true abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies sampled in canopy and understory strata in a subtropical forest. We compared the diversity values calculated by observed and estimated abundance data through the hidden diversity framework. This framework evaluates the deviation of observed diversity when compared with diversities derived from estimated true abundances, and if such deviation represents a bias or a noise in the observed diversity pattern. C_LIO_LIThe hidden diversity values differed between strata for all diversity measures, except for functional richness. The taxonomic measure was the only one where we observed an inversion of the most diverse stratum when imperfect detection was included. Regarding phylogenetic and functional measures, the strata showed distinct responses to imperfect detection, despite the tendency to overestimate observed diversity. While the understory showed noise for the phylogenetic measure, since the observed pattern was maintained, the canopy had biased diversity for the functional metric. This bias occurred since no significant differences were found between strata for observed diversity, but rather for estimated diversity, with the canopy being more clustered. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate that ignore imperfect detection may lead to unrealistic estimates of diversity and hence, to erroneous interpretations of patterns and processes that structure biological communities. For fruit-feeding butterflies, according to their phylogenetic position or functional traits, the undetected individuals triggered different responses in the relationship of the diversity measures to the environmental factor. This highlights the importance to evaluate and include the uncertainty in species detectability before calculating biodiversity measures to describe communities. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Capturing biodiversity complexities while accounting for imperfect detection: the application of occupancy-based diversity profiles.
J. F. Abrams, R. Sollmann, … A. Wilting·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2020
- Estimating probabilistic dark diversity based on the hypergeometric distribution
C. P. Carmona, R. Szava-Kovats, M. Partel·bioRxiv·May 15, 2019
- A short cut to sample coverage standardization in meta-barcoding data provides new insights into land use effects on insect diversity
Mareike Kortmann, Anne Chao, … Jörg C. Müller·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2025
- Optimal inventorying and monitoring of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity
P. Cardoso, M. A. Arnedo, … R. Hilario·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2016
- Biological communities as interacting compartments: thermodynamic properties and diversity indices
Fernando Meloni, Gilberto M. Nakamura, Alexandre Souto Martinez·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2017
- Plants stand still but hide: imperfect and heterogeneous detection is the rule when counting plants
J. Perret, A. Besnard, … G. Papuga·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2022