Menstrual cycle phase length variation is associated with daily symptom burden
Lisette J. A. KogelmaniD, David WestergaardiD, Karina BanasikiD, Henriette Svarre NielseniD, Thomas Folkmann HanseniD
Abstract
Menstrual symptoms vary across the cycle, yet most research assumes a normative 28-day cycle with fixed phase durations, obscuring the physiological relevance of natural cycle variation. Using the mcPHASES dataset, we characterised cycle and phase length variation across 96 menstrual cycles from 37 participants, with ovulation timing estimated from daily urinary luteinizing hormone measurements using a Bayesian hierarchical model, and examined associations with daily symptoms in a subset of 64 cycles from 35 participants with complete symptom data. Twelve physical, mental, and behavioural symptom domains were modelled using Bayesian ordinal regression, with posterior uncertainty in phase-length predictors propagated via a measurement error framework. Total cycle length was not associated with daily symptom burden, except sleep disturbances. By contrast, phase length decomposition revealed systematic associations across multiple domains: longer menstrual phase length was broadly associated with greater symptom intensity spanning physical, gastrointestinal, affective, and sleep domains; longer luteal phase duration was associated with greater fatigue and more frequent headaches, but lower sore breast intensity and lower stress; and longer follicular phase duration and later ovulation were each associated with greater sore breast intensity and more frequent mood swings. These associations require knowledge of actual ovulation timing and cannot be recovered from cycle length alone, indicating that the common assumption of a fixed 14-day luteal phase introduces systematic misclassification of hormonal exposure. Daily symptom intensity was also predominantly person-specific, with cycle phase explaining little of the between-person variance across most symptoms. These findings indicate that calendar-based phase assignment is insufficient for research and clinical assessment of hormone-sensitive conditions, and that person-specific baselines, rather than population-level phase averages, are needed for clinically meaningful symptom monitoring.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The menstrual cycle is a primary contributor to cyclic variation in women’s mood, behavior, and vital signs
E. Pierson, T. Althoff, … J. Leskovec·bioRxiv·May 29, 2019
- Menstrual cycle and exogenous attention toward emotional expressions
Fátima Álvarez, Uxía Fernández‐Folgueiras, … Luis Carretié·Hormones and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2022
- The menstrual cycle through the lens of a wearable device: insights into physiology, sleep, and cycle variability
Alexander Gonzalez, Johanna J. O’Day, … Jennifer L. Hicks·npj Digital MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 25, 2026
- Perimenstrual Exacerbation of Symptoms in Borderline Personality Disorder: Evidence from Multilevel Models and the Carolina Premenstrual Assessment Scoring System
Tory Anne Eisenlohr-Moul, Katja Maria Schmalenberger, … Susan S. Girdler·Psychological MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 28, 2018
- Menstrual cycle selectively elevates anticipatory effort cost without altering reward sensitivity in human motivation
Nitsan Schwarz, Daniel Harlev, Noham Wolpe·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2026
- Menstrual cycle phase and premenstrual symptoms in relation with the stress response: an fMRI study
Elise Bücklein, Ann-Christin Sophie Kimmig, … Ann‐Christine Ehlis·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026