bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Menstrual cycle phase and premenstrual symptoms in relation with the stress response: an fMRI study
Elise BückleiniD, Ann-Christin Sophie KimmigiD, Thomas DresleriD, Michael LämmerhoferiD, Tamara JankeriD, Lydia KogleriD, Birgit DerntliD, Andreas Jochen FallgatteriD, Erika ComascoiD, Ann‐Christine EhlisiD
Abstract
Objective: Women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) experience affective lability, irritability, depressed mood, and anxiety during the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Stress reactivity may contribute to the development of these symptoms, yet neural correlates remain unexplored. We examined neural, behavioral and endocrine stress responses across menstrual cycle phases in women with and without PMS. Methods: 26 women with PMS and 24 women without PMS participated in two fMRI sessions, during the mid-follicular (days 5 to 11) and late-luteal phases (days -7 to -1). Participants completed the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST). Subjective stress ratings and salivary cortisol were collected at six time points before and after stress induction. Stress-related brain activation was assessed using whole-brain and region-of-interest analyses. Results: Subjective stress ratings increased as expected from before to after the MIST, with no group or phase differences. Salivary cortisol was significantly higher during the mid-follicular phase, with no group effect or significant pre-post MIST difference. While the stress task elicited activation patterns in stress-related regions, whole-brain analysis revealed no significant effects of group (PMS vs. no PMS) or menstrual cycle phase (follicular vs. luteal) on the neural stress response. Considering premenstrual symptom severity as a predictor revealed significant group-by-symptom severity interactions in the right inferior frontal gyrus and the right superior temporal gyrus. Conclusion: Using a within-subject repeated-measures design, we found neural responses to psychosocial stress to be stable across menstrual cycle phases. Individual differences in symptom severity may nevertheless be associated with differences in stress-related brain activation.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Menstrual cycle and exogenous attention toward emotional expressions
Fátima Álvarez, Uxía Fernández‐Folgueiras, … Luis Carretié·Hormones and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2022
- INFLUENCE OF PREMENSTRUAL SYNDROME ON ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE BY EXPRESSIONS IN THE LUTEAL PHASE
Fátima Álvarez, Estrella Veiga-Zarza, … Luis Carretié·Hormones and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2025
- Prefrontal representation of affective stimuli: importance of stress, sex, and context
Tyler Wallace, Brent Myers·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2023
- Functional brain network topology across the menstrual cycle is sex hormone dependent and correlates with the individual well-being
Marianna Liparoti, Emahnuel Troisi Lopez, … Pierpaolo Sorrentino·Journal of Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2021
- Stronger brain responses to acute stress reflect greater everyday stress variability
Madeleine Kördel, Anne Kühnel, … Nils B. Kroemer·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2026
- Menstrual cycle phase alters corticospinal excitability and spike-timing-dependent plasticity in healthy females
Pádraig Spillane, Elisa Pastorio, … Paul Ansdell·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2026