Journal of NeuroendocrinologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Scanning for Representation: A Scoping Review of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in MRI Studies of the Maternal Brain
Edwina R. OrchardiD, Clíona L. KellyiD, Kathryn M. WalliD, Josephine C.P. LevyiD, Jin Young ShiniD, Claudia G. GaebleriD, Victoria R. Hart-DerrickiD, Kathy AyalaiD, Amorine AdodoiD, Michèle J. DayiD, Melissa Christine FunaroiD, Kathleen GuaniD, Termara ParkeriD, Jocelyn A. RicardiD, Francesca PenneriD, Tal YatziviD, Helena J. V. RutherfordiD
Abstract
A growing number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are examining brain changes across pregnancy and early motherhood, gaining fundamental insight into the neural adaptations of motherhood, with critical clinical and policy implications for supporting mother, child, and family unit. As the field takes off, now is the time to take stock of the current literature and neuroscience practices, to ensure that the field is based on studies that are robust, representative, and transparent. Here, we conducted a scoping review to understand the racial and ethnic diversity of participants reported in MRI studies of the maternal brain, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Our findings highlight three key issues in the 185 identified studies of the maternal brain using MRI: (1) the widespread underreporting of participant racial and ethnic data, with only 38.38% of studies reporting race and/or ethnicity demographics; (2) the overrepresentation of white participants, with 46.83% of the samples that report race and/or ethnicity identifying as white/Caucasian; and (3) the disproportionate geographical locations of studies, with 68.65% of studies from North America or Europe and Central Asia. These findings raise concerns about the generalizability of existing research beyond WEIRD (western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) populations, and underscore the urgent need for concerted structural change in neuroscience research practices. While identifying a lack of diversity is only the first step, this scoping review serves as a call to action for greater representation in future research, for our own research group as well as others.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 42th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Current Reporting Practices in Human Neuroscience Research
Arianna M. Gard, Deena Ahmad Shariq, … Luke Williamson Hyde·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2024
- Neuroimaging of intimate partner violence can underrepresent the most affected survivors
Craig Waldence McFarland, Aaron Kucyi, Eve M. Valera·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2026
- Brain predictive models of cognition fail to generalize across ethnicities: Modality-dependent bias in MRI-based prediction
Farzane Lal Khakpoor, William van der Vliet, … Narun Pornpattananangkul·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2025
- Long-term association of pregnancy and maternal brain structure: the Rotterdam Study
Jūratė Aleknavičiūtė, Tavia E. Evans, … Steven A. Kushner·European Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2022
- Increasing the representation of minoritized youth for inclusive and reproducible brain-behavior associations
Jivesh Ramduny, Lucina Q. Uddin, … Arielle Ryan Baskin-sommers·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2024
- Data management and sharing in neuroimaging: Practices and perceptions of MRI researchers
John Borghi, Ana E. Van Gulick·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2018