bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates working memory processing speed
Julie Dimmendaal, Wang XiaojuaniD, Bas J Dijkslag, Laura E HuizingaiD, Sander Maalderink, Marijn Priest, Femke J.E. van DamiD, Mark M. SpaniD, Miles WischnewskiiD
Abstract
BackgroundTheta-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over prefrontal cortex has been proposed to modulate working memory (WM), yet behavioral effects are often inconsistent. One potential source of variability is the tACS phase during stimulus presentation. ObjectiveWe tested whether behavioral performance during WM depends on the phase of prefrontal theta-tACS. MethodsTwenty participants completed two sessions of prefrontal 4 Hz tACS in a within-subject design, receiving active and sham stimulation in separate sessions. Participants performed a visuospatial change detection task (CDT) and a verbal N-back task. Stimulation effects on overall accuracy and reaction time were analyzed. Subsequently, phase-specific analyses related stimulation phase at task-relevant stimulus presentation to behavioral performance using circular regression models. Preferred phases across participants were tested using Rayleigh tests. ResultsNo significant overall effects of active compared with sham tACS on accuracy or reaction time were observed in either task. However, phase-specific analyses revealed stronger phase-dependent modulation of reaction time during active tACS compared with sham. In the CDT, this effect was present across difficulty levels, whereas in the N-back task it was observed only in the 3-back condition. No reliable phase-dependent effects were observed for accuracy. Preferred phases varied across participants and did not cluster around a common phase. ConclusionsPrefrontal theta-tACS can modulate WM performance in a phase-dependent manner even in the absence of average behavioral effects. The observation of phase-dependent reaction-time modulation across visuospatial and verbal WM tasks suggests that stimulation phase may be a relevant source of variability across cognitive domains.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Theta transcranial alternating current stimulation is not effective in improving working memory performance
Dauren Kasanov, Olga I. Dorogina, … Yuri G. Pavlov·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- Working memory enhancement using real-time phase-tuned transcranial alternating current stimulation
David Haslacher, Alessia Cavallo, … Surjo Raphael Soekadar·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2024
- The effects of electroencephalogram feature-based transcranial alternating current stimulation on working memory and electrophysiology
Lanting Zeng, Mingrou Guo, … Pengfei Wei·Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2022
- Alpha Oscillatory Activity Causally Linked to Working Memory Retention: Insights from Online Phase-corrected Closed-loop Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
Xueli Chen, Ru Ma, … Xiaochu Zhang·bioRxiv·May 23, 2021
- Engagement-Dependent Neural Entrainment Underlies Dissociable tACS Effects on Item and Sequence Working Memory
- Mapping long-term memory modulation with transcranial alternating current stimulation
Dima Chitic, Miles Wischnewski·Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural InterfacePeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026