Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy
V. Orlando, F. Rea, L. savare, I. Guarino, S. Mucherino, A. Perrella, U. Trama, E. Coscioni, E. Menditto, G. Corrao
Abstract
BackgroundThe novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic spread rapidly worldwide increasing exponentially in Italy. To date, there is lack of studies describing clinical characteristics of the population most at risk of infection. Hence, we aimed to identify clinical predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk and to develop and validate a score predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection risk comparing it with unspecific surrogates. MethodsRetrospective case/control study using administrative health-related database was carried out in Southern Italy (Campania region) among beneficiaries of Regional Health Service aged over than 30 years. For each subject with Covid-19 confirmed diagnosis (case), up to five controls were randomly matched for gender, age and municipality of residence. Odds ratios and 90% confidence intervals for associations between candidate predictors and risk of infection were estimated by means of conditional logistic regression. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Score (SIS), was developed by generating a total aggregate score obtained from assignment of a weight at each selected covariate using coefficients estimated from the model. Finally, the score was categorized by assigning increasing values from 1 to 4. SIS was validated by comparison with specific and unspecific predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection. ResultsSubjects suffering from diabetes, anaemias, Parkinsons disease, mental disorders, cardiovascular and inflammatory bowel and kidney diseases showed increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Similar estimates were recorded for men and women and younger and older than 65 years. Fifteen conditions significantly contributed to the SIS. As SIS value increases, risk progressively increases, being odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection among people with the highest SIS value (SIS=4), 1.74 times higher than those unaffected by any SIS contributing conditions (SIS=1). ConclusionThis study identified conditions and diseases making individuals more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results are a decision-maker support tool for identifying population most at risk allowing adoption of preventive measures to minimize a potential new relapse damage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Risk factors associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A prospective, longitudinal, unicenter study in Reus, Spain
S. Iftimie, A. F. Lopez-Azcona, … A. Castro·bioRxiv·May 29, 2020
- Predicting COVID-19 Severity with a Specific Nucleocapsid Antibody plus Disease Risk Factor Score
S. Sen, E. C. Sanders, … G. A. Weiss·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2020
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies in District Srinagar, northern India - a cross-sectional study
S. M. S. Khan, M. A. Qurieshi, … S. Ayoub·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2020
- Interleukin-3 is a predictive marker for severity and outcome during SARS-CoV-2 infections
A. Benard, A. Jacobsen, … G. F. Weber·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2020
- Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 spike ELISA for use in contact investigations and serosurveillance
B. Freeman, S. Lester, … N. J. Thornburg·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2020
- Diet Induced Obesity and Diabetes Enhance Mortality and Reduces Vaccine Efficacy for SARS-CoV-2
R. Johnson, J. Ardunay, … M. Frieman·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2022