Estimating invasion dynamics with geopolitical-unit level records: performance and similarity of common methods using both simulated data and a real case
Abstract
Estimating invasion dynamic is important to the management of invasive species, and geopolitical-unit level data are usually the most abundant and available records of invasive species. Here, for the first time we evaluated performances and similarities of eight common methods to estimate spread pattern and spread dynamic of invasive species with geopolitical-unit level data, and assessed impacts of variations in geopolitical-units on each method using simulated spread data. We also formulated a concave hull boundary displacement method (i.e., CEB) and an area-based regression method (i.e., AER) for estimating spread with geopolitical-unit data. Three regions with different sized counties in the United States (U.S.) were selected to conduct simulations and three spread scenarios were simulated. R2 and root mean square error were used to evaluate the abilities of all methods to estimate spread. Correlation coefficients were used to assess the similarity pattern of all methods. Finally, kudzu bug Megacopta cribraria, an invasive insect in the U.S., was used as a case study to test the generality of some results concluded from the simulated research. We found the CEB and two regression methods consistently estimated the right expansion patterns. Two boundary displacement and two area-based regression methods estimated highly correlated spread and were the best four methods, among which CEB had the best estimation. Distance-based regression methods are sensitive to irregularity and stochasticity in spread, and the minimum spread distance method had low ability to estimate spread. The case study showed consistent results with the simulated research. Both regression and boundary displacement methods can estimate spread patterns, overall rate, and spread dynamics of invasive species. Boundary displacement methods best estimate spread rates and dynamics; however, for spread without clear infestation outlines, area-based regression methods can be good alternatives.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Leveraging spatial scale and temporal variation to optimize estimates of invasive spread rates
Joseph Keller, Sebastiano De Bona, Matthew R. Helmus·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2025
- G-IRAE: a Generalised approach for linking the total Impact of invasion to species' Range, Abundance and per-unit Effects
G. Latombe, J. A. Catford, … M. A. McGeoch·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2021
- Improving a removal model for evaluating density changes in a widespread invasive species
John R. Foster, Kim M. Pepin, … Ryan S. Miller·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2025
- Quantifying vulnerability to plant invasion across global ecosystems
William G. Pfadenhauer, Bethany A. Bradley·Ecological ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Two decades of satellite images reveal the spatial and temporal dynamics of leafy spurge invasion and improve species distribution models
Thomas A. Lake, Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist, David A. Moeller·bioRxiv·May 9, 2025
- Disentangling the spread dynamics of insect invasions using spatial networks
S. A. Estay, C. P. Silva, … F. A. Labra·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2022