How Cells Tame Noise While Maintaining Ultrasensitive Transcriptional Responses
Abstract
Ultrasensitive transcriptional switches are essential for converting gradual molecular inputs into decisive gene expression responses, enabling critical behaviors such as bistability and oscillations. While cooperative binding, relying on direct repressor-DNA binding, has been classically regarded as a key ultrasensitivity mechanism, recent theoretical works have demonstrated that combinations of indirect repression mechanisms--sequestration, blocking, and displacement--can also achieve ultrasensitive switches with greater robustness to transcriptional noise. However, these previous works have neglected key biological constraints such as DNA binding kinetics and the limited availability of transcriptional activators, raising the question of whether ultrasensitivity and noise robustness can be sustained under biologically realistic conditions. Here, we systematically assess the impact of these factors on ultrasensitivity and noise robustness under physiologically plausible conditions. We show that while various repression combinations can reduce noise, only the full combination of all three indirect mechanisms consistently maintains low noise and high ultrasensitivity. As a result, biological oscillators employing this triple repression architecture retain precise rhythmic switching even under high noise, and even when activators are shared across thousands of target genes. Our findings offer a mechanistic explanation for the frequent co-occurrence of these repression mechanisms in natural gene regulatory systems. AUTHOR SUMMARYCells must make accurate decisions in noisy environments using limited molecular resources. One essential tool for this is the ultrasensitive transcriptional switch, which enables sharp transitions in gene expression. While cooperative binding has long been viewed as the primary mechanism behind ultrasensitivity, it is highly sensitive to molecular noise. Our study explores how cells overcome this limitation by combining three indirect repression mechanisms: sequestration, blocking, and displacement. We show that this triple-repression architecture not only generates ultrasensitivity but also ensures noise robustness under physiologically realistic conditions--even when a single pool of transcription factors regulates thousands of genes. These findings reveal a biologically feasible strategy for noise-resilient transcription and offer a mechanistic explanation for why these repression strategies frequently co-occur in natural systems.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 35%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A robust ultrasensitive transcriptional switch in noisy cellular environments
Eui Min Jeong, Jae Kyoung Kim·npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2024
- Combined multiple transcriptional repression mechanisms generate ultrasensitivity and oscillations
Eui Min Jeong, Yun Min Song, Jae Kyoung Kim·Interface FocusPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2022
- Network design principle for robust oscillatory behaviors with respect to biological noise
Lingxia Qiao, Zhibo Zhang, … Lei Zhang·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2022
- Transcription factor binding process is the primary driver of noise in gene expression
Lavisha Parab, Sampriti Pal, Riddhiman Dhar·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2022
- Quantitative Control of Noise in Mammalian Gene Expression by Dynamic Histone Regulations
Deng Tan, Rui Chen, … Wei Huang·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2021
- Genetic redundancies enhance information transfer in noisy regulatory circuits
Guillermo Rodrigo, Juan F Poyatos·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2016