medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Validation of the ACMG/AMP guidelines-based seven-category variant classification system
Jian‐Min CheniD, Emmanuelle MassoniD, Wen‐Bin ZouiD, Zhuan LiaoiD, Emmanuelle GéniniD, D.N. CooperiD, Claude FéreciD
Abstract
BackgroundOne shortcoming of employing the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP)-recommended five-category variant classification scheme ("pathogenic", "likely pathogenic", "uncertain significance", "likely benign" and "benign") in medical genetics lies in the schemes inherent inability to deal properly with variants that fall midway between "pathogenic" and "benign". Employing chronic pancreatitis as a disease model, and focusing on the four most studied chronic pancreatitis-related genes, we recently expanded the five-category ACMG/AMP scheme into a seven-category variant classification system. With the addition of two new classificatory categories, "predisposing" and "likely predisposing", our seven-category system promises to provide improved classification for the entire spectrum of variants in any disease-causing gene. The applicability and practical utility of our seven-category variant classification system however remains to be demonstrated in other disease/gene contexts, and this has been the aim of the current analysis. ResultsWe have sought to demonstrate the potential universality of pathological variants that could be ascribed the new variant terminology ( predisposing) by trialing it across three Mendelian disease contexts (i.e., autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and X-linked). To this end, we firstly employed illustrative genes/variants characteristic of these three contexts. On the basis of our own knowledge and expertise, we identified a series of variants that fitted well with our "predisposing" category, including "hypomorphic" variants in the PKD1 gene and "variants of varying clinical consequence" in the CFTR gene. These examples, followed by reasonable extrapolations, enabled us to infer the widespread occurrence of "predisposing" variants in disease-causing genes. Such "predisposing" variants are likely to contribute significantly to the complexity of human genetic disease and may account not only for a considerable proportion of the unexplained cases of monogenic and oligogenic disease but also for much of the "missing heritability" characteristic of complex disease. ConclusionEmploying an evidence-based approach together with reasonable extrapolations, we demonstrate both the applicability and utility of our seven-category variant classification system for disease-causing genes. The recognition of the new "predisposing" category not only has immediate implications for variant detection and interpretation but should also have important consequences for reproductive genetic counseling.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A proposed general variant classification framework using chronic pancreatitis as a disease model
Emmanuelle Masson, Wen‐Bin Zou, … Jian‐Min Chen·Human GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2022
- Systematic large-scale application of ClinGen InSiGHT APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification criteria substantially alleviates the burden of variants of uncertain significance in ClinVar and LOVD databases
Xiaoyu Yin, Marcy E. Richardson, … Stefan Aretz·medRxiv·May 3, 2024
- Evaluation of Bayesian Point-Based System on the Variant Classification of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Genes
Mohammad K. Eldomery, Jamie L. Maciaszek, … Patrick R. Blackburn·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2024
- Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria)
Vineel Bhat, Ivan A. Adzhubei, … Christopher A. Cassa·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2022
- Mismatch repair gene specifications to the ACMG/AMP classification criteria: Consensus recommendations from the InSiGHT ClinGen Hereditary Colorectal Cancer / Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel
John‐Paul Plazzer, Finlay Macrae, … Andreas Laner·medRxiv·May 13, 2024
- Challenges in Classification of PKD1 Missense Variation in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
Nicole Lehmann, Steven Koo, … Amali C. Mallawaarachchi·medRxiv·Aug 2, 2026