henhaobio
Sign in

Abstract

BackgroundIt is known that gene- and disease-specific evidence domains can potentially improve the capability of the ACMG/AMP classification criteria to categorize pathogenicity for variants. We aimed to include gene-disease-specific clinical, predictive, and functional domain specifications to the ACMG/AMP criteria with respect to MMR genes. MethodsStarting with the original criteria (InSiGHT criteria) developed by the InSiGHT Variant Interpretation Committee, we systematically addressed specifications to the ACMG/AMP criteria to enable more comprehensive pathogenicity assessment within the ClinGen VCEP framework, resulting in an MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria. ResultsA total of 19 criteria were specified, 9 were considered not applicable and there were 35 variations of strength of the evidence. A pilot set of 48 variants was tested using the new MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria. Most variants remained unaltered, as compared to the previous InSiGHT criteria; however, an additional four variants of uncertain significance were reclassified to P/LP or LB by the MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria framework. ConclusionThe MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria have proven feasible for implementation, are consistent with the original InSiGHT criteria, and enable additional combinations of evidence for variant classification. This study provides a strong foundation for implementing gene-disease-specific knowledge and experience, and could also hold immense potential in a clinical setting.

Citations
7

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISYin '24Parsons '24Chen '23Brünger '23Richardson '24Eisenhart '25
65% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Xiaoyu Yin, Marcy E. Richardson, Andreas Laner+29 more·medRxiv·May 3, 2024