Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria)
Vineel BhatiD, Ivan A. AdzhubeiiD, James D. FifeiD, Matthew S. LeboiD, Christopher A. CassaiD
Abstract
PurposeTo explore whether evidence of pathogenicity from prior variant classifications in ClinVar could be used to inform variant interpretation using the ACMG/AMP clinical guidelines. MethodsWe identify distinct SNVs which are either similar in location or in functional consequence to pathogenic variants in ClinVar, and analyze evidence in support of pathogenicity using three interpretation criteria. ResultsThousands of variants, including many in clinically actionable disease genes (ACMG SFv3.0), have evidence of pathogenicity from existing variant classifications, accounting for 2.5% of non-synonymous SNVs within ClinVar. Notably, there are many variants with uncertain or conflicting classifications which cause the same amino acid substitution as other pathogenic variants (PS1, N=323), variants which are predicted to cause different amino acid substitutions in the same codon as pathogenic variants (PM5, N=7,692), and LOF variants which are present in genes where many LOF variants are classified as pathogenic (PVS1, N=3,635). The majority of these variants have similar computational predictions of pathogenicity and splicing impact as their associated pathogenic variants. ConclusionBroadly, over 1.4 million SNVs exome-wide could make use of information from previously classified pathogenic variants. We have developed a pipeline to identify variants meeting these criteria, which may inform interpretation efforts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Field percentile
- top 32%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pathogenic paralogous variants can be used to apply the ACMG PS1 and PM5 variant interpretation criteria
Tobias Brünger, Alina Ivaniuk, … Dennis Lal·medRxiv·Aug 22, 2023
- Systematic large-scale application of ClinGen InSiGHT APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification criteria substantially alleviates the burden of variants of uncertain significance in ClinVar and LOVD databases
Xiaoyu Yin, Marcy E. Richardson, … Stefan Aretz·medRxiv·May 3, 2024
- APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP
Logan C. Walker, Miguel de la Hoya, … Amanda B. Spurdle·medRxiv·Feb 24, 2023
- Language models reveal evidence gaps in variants of uncertain significance
Weijiang Li, Vineel Bhat, … Christopher A. Cassa·medRxiv·Mar 2, 2026
- Evaluating the impact of in silico predictors on clinical variant classification
Emma H. Wilcox, Mahdi Sarmady, … Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2021
- Recommendations for Interpreting the Loss of Function PVS1 ACMG/AMP Variant Criteria
Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun, Tina F. Pesaran, … ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group (ClinGen SVI)·Human MutationPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2018