Cultural affiliation accounts for most of the spatiotemporal variation in burial rite practices
Elisabetta CanteriiD, Robert StaniukiD, Adrian TimpsoniD, Peter Schauer, Jelena B. BulatovićiD, Maria IvanovaiD, Samantha ReiteriD, Helene Agerskov RoseiD, Jan KolářiD, Mark ThomasiD, Fernando RacimoiD, Stephen J. ShennaniD
Abstract
Describing and interpreting spatiotemporal patterns in human culture has been a central focus of anthropology and archaeology for over a century. Recent ethnographic studies have highlighted the complexity of the processes generating these patterns, including isolation-by-distance, homophily, and common descent. However, investigating these processes in prehistoric archaeology remains challenging. Here we make use of a new interdisciplinary database and a combined dataset of ancient DNA (aDNA) genomic sequences to analyse the relationship between spatiotemporal patterns in cultural and genomic variation, by testing whether broadly defined clusters of genomic affinities correspond to spatiotemporal changes in burial rites, while controlling for other factors, using a Gaussian process model. We use data from the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database (BIAD), linking mortuary information from [~]4,200 individuals with genetic ancestry and mobility data inferred from over 1,300 human genomes, from Western Eurasia [~]10,000-2000 BP. By integrating and modelling these diverse datasets, we aim to provide a detailed understanding of how genomic history intersects with cultural evolution, offering new insights into the dynamics behind these complex processes, and the extent to which genes and culture are transmitted in parallel. In the case of burial orientation, we found that cultural affiliation was the main factor accounting for variation with little to no role for ancestry, while for body position the picture was more mixed but cultural affiliation also played an important role.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Ancient DNA Insights into Aboriginal Australian Mortuary Practices
S. Wasef, J. L. Wright, … D. M. Lambert·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2020
- Estimating human mobility in Holocene Western Eurasia with large-scale ancient genomic data
Clemens Schmid, Stephan Schiffels·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 23, 2023
- Relationships between clans and genetic kin explain cultural similarities over vast distances: the case of Yakutia
V. Zvenigorosky, S. Duchesne, … E. Crubezy·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2017
- A geographic history of human genetic ancestry
Michael C. Gründler, Jonathan Terhorst, Gideon S. Bradburd·SciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2025
- Tracing Neanderthal ancestry patterns through successive population expansions in Europe
Alexandros Tsoupas, Claudio S. Quilodrán, … Mathias Currat·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026
- Estimating genetic kin relationships in prehistoric populations
José Manuel Monroy Kuhn, Mattias Jakobsson, Torsten Günther·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2018