The effects of resource subsidy duration on detritus-based stream ecosystems: a stream mesocosm experiment

Abstract

Most of the resource subsidies are temporally variable, and studies have revealed that ecological processes can be mediated by the temporal attributes of subsidies, such as timing and frequency. Less studies have, however, examined the effects of the subsidy duration, an another major temporal attribute, on consumer populations, communities and ecosystem functions. Using an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we demonstrated that, even with the same total amounts, the prolonged subsidy let large-stage fish effectively monopolize the subsidy over small-stage fish, while the pulsed subsidy allowed small-stage fish to increase the ingestion rate of the subsidy. This effect resulted in causing weaker indirect positive effects on in-situ benthic prey and a leaf breakdown rate with the prolonged subsidy than with the pulsed-subsidy although it depended on dominant benthic prey species having different edibility. Increasing evidences have shown that global warming would not only advance, but also prolong the growing seasons, which may, in turn, make subsidies more prolonged. The ecological significance of the subsidy duration might be common in nature, and should be incorporated to better understand ecological processes in spatially and temporally coupled ecosystems.