Spatial modeling of Cultural Ecosystem Services from social media data: Systematic review of operability, opportunities, limitations and ways forward
Carlos J. NavarroiD, Akram ElghouatiD, Marta Rueda-Pasadas, José Carlos Pérez-GiróniD, Ricardo A. Moreno-LlorcaiD, Ana Sofía VaziD, Javier Martínez‐LópeziD, Nuria PistóniD, Domingo Alcaraz‐SeguraiD
Abstract
O_LIThis systematic review explores the use of social media data to spatially model Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES), which are non-material benefits provided by ecosystems that support human well-being. Based on a search of 510 scientific articles in Web of Science and Scopus, we carefully selected and analyzed those that focused on spatial modeling of CES using social media data. We aimed to (a) identify the diversity of CES assessed, (b) analyse the social media platforms used as data sources, (c) evaluate the modelling frameworks employed, and (d) summarise the predictor variables included in these models. C_LIO_LIWe found that the most studied CES were those related to physical and psychological experiences (62%; especially recreation) and the main predictor variables were the presence of natural elements (52%), land use and land cover maps, and topographic variables, often weighted by applying distance-based metrics (24%). Twenty-four social media data sources were identified but Flickr was by far the most widely used one (40%). MaxEnt (37%) and Random Forest (16%) were the most commonly used modeling tools. The most commonly used metrics to assess model performance were AUC-ROC, AIC, and R2 values. C_LIO_LIWhile the use of social media offers an opportunity to study CES and provide cost-effective and scalable insights, this article discusses some limitations and considerations raised from the literature review to be taken into account when using this type of data. These include the quality and representativeness of social media data, the importance of a clear definition of CES, a proper labeling of social media data, and an appropriate selection of spatial modeling techniques. C_LIO_LIFuture research should address these limitations and considerations by integrating different data sources and refining methodologies to improve the accuracy and applicability of CES models. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current practices and highlights areas for further investigation in the spatial modeling of CES using social media data. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- What drives cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas? An AI-assisted answer using social media
José Carlos Pérez-Girón, Carlos J. Navarro, … Domingo Alcaraz‐Segura·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2025
- A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services
Heera Lee, Sven Lautenbach·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2016
- Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: a quantitative review
M. J. Feldman, L. Imbeau, … N. Fenton·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2020
- Testing the accuracy of species distribution models based on community science data
M. Velde, J. C. Cooper, H. Garrod·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2023
- ICONIC MANAKINS AND DESPICABLE GRACKLES: COMPARING BIRD-RELATED CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ACROSS BIRDWATCHERS, FARMERS, AND URBANITES IN NORTHWESTERN COSTA RICA
A. Echeverri, R. Naidoo, … J. Zhao·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2019
- Blind spots in ecosystem services research and implementation
Sven Lautenbach, Anne-Christine Mupepele, … Martin Volk·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2015