Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Pooling quantitative MRI data: A multi-protocol study of healthy subcortical ageing
Mikhail A. ZubkoviD, Kerrin PineiD, Pierre‐Louis BaziniD, Niklas Kuegler, Puneet TalwariD, Nasrin Mortazavi, Solène DaubyiD, Chloe GeroniD, Elise BeckersiD, Laurent LamalleiD, Christophe L. M. PhillipsiD, Fabienne ColletteiD, Pierre MaquetiD, Émilie LommersiD, Anneke AlkemadeiD, Nikolaus WeiskopfiD, Gilles VandewalleiD, Evgeniya P. KirilinaiD
Abstract
Quantitative MRI (qMRI) measures relaxation rates, exchange rates and proton densities that reflect biophysical properties of tissue and are ideally free from protocol- and scanner-dependence. In practice, qMRI has not yet achieved this level of independence from sequence and hardware choice, and quantitative estimates often differ across sites and acquisition schemes. At the same time pooling data across different sources can be beneficial to statistical power of longitudinal, cross-sectional or case-control studies. Here we investigate how protocol and hardware differences can affect pooling data from different sources in large ultra high field (UHF) qMRI studies in the context of healthy aging. We combine the openly available ageing UHF qMRI MP2RAGEME-based dataset with two different MPM-based sets of qMRI data. We evaluate how pooling affects age dependence of qMRI parameters and investigate protocol-related biases, with a particular focus on subcortical structures. We focus the analysis, first, on replication and expansion of the reference qMRI dataset on normative aging, second, the examination of the protocol influence on the estimated qMRI values, and third, on detecting the protocol effect on the age dependence inferred from the data. We find that the age-related changes for R1 measure around 4-17% of the lifespan mean in different structures. Similarly, age-related R2* variation in different structures constitutes around 6-30%. Subcortical structure volume change is on the order of 5-27%. We further observe larger relative difference between protocols for R1 and volume, while R2* remains more consistent for most regions. We show how pooling the UHF qMRI data from different sites and collected with different quantitative protocols can be both detrimental and beneficial for the analysis outcomes.
- assay: multiome
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 50%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantitative MRI Provides Markers Of Intra-, Inter-Regional, And Age-Related Differences In Young Adult Cortical Microstructure
Daniel Carey, Francesco Caprini, … Frederic Dick·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2017
- Normative trajectories of R1, R2* and magnetic susceptibility in basal ganglia on healthy ageing
Kwok‐Shing Chan, Marcel P. Zwiers, … José P. Marques·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Loss of Brain Structural qMRI Signatures in Aging
Niv Amos, Shir Filo, … Aviv Mezer·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2025
- Assessing Quantitative MRI Techniques using Multimodal Comparisons
Francis Carter, Alfred Anwander, … Christopher J. Steele·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2025
- The MRi-Share database: brain imaging in a cross-sectional cohort of 1,870 university students
Ami Tsuchida, Alexandre Laurent, … Bernard M. Mazoyer·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2021
- Statistical analyses of motion-corrupted MRI relaxometry data
Nadège Corbin, Rita Oliveira, … Antoine Lutti·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2023