Systematic determination of the mitochondrial proportion in human and mice tissues for single-cell RNA sequencing data quality control
Abstract
MotivationQuality control (QC) is a critical step in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data analysis. Low-quality cells are removed from the analysis during the QC process to avoid misinterpretation of the data. One of the important QC metrics is the mitochondrial proportion (mtDNA%), which is used as a threshold to filter out low-quality cells. Early publications in the field established a threshold of 5% and since then, it has been used as a default in several software packages for scRNA-seq data analysis and adopted as a standard in many scRNA-seq studies. However, the validity of using a uniform threshold across different species, single-cell technologies, tissues, and cell types has not been adequately assessed. ResultsWe systematically analyzed 5,530,106 cells reported in 1,349 annotated datasets available in the PanglaoDB database and found that the average mtDNA% in scRNA-seq data across human tissues is significantly higher than in mouse tissues. This difference is not confounded by the platform used to generate the data. Based on this finding, we propose new reference values of the mtDNA% for 121 tissues of mice and 44 tissues of humans. In general, for mouse tissues, the 5% threshold performs well to distinguish between healthy and low-quality cells. However, for human tissues, the 5% threshold should be reconsidered as it fails to accurately discriminate between healthy and low-quality cells in 29.5% (13 of 44) tissues analyzed. We conclude that omitting the mtDNA% QC filter or adopting a suboptimal mtDNA% threshold may lead to erroneous biological interpretations of scRNA-seq data. AvailabilityThe code used to download datasets, perform the analyzes, and produce the figures is available at https://github.com/dosorio/mtProportion Contactdcosorioh@tamu.edu Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 211
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- miQC: An adaptive probabilistic framework for quality control of single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Ariel A. Hippen, Matías Marín Falco, … Stephanie C. Hicks·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2021
- MitoChontrol: Adaptive mitochondrial filtering for robust single-cell RNA sequencing quality control
Caitlin Strassburg, Danielle Pitlor, … Shikhar Uttam·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2026
- Biology-inspired data-driven quality control for scientific discovery in single-cell transcriptomics
Ayshwarya Subramanian, Mikhail Alperovich, … Bo Li·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 27, 2022
- Filtering cells with high mitochondrial content removes viable metabolically altered malignant cell populations in cancer single-cell studies
Josephine Yates, Agnieszka Kraft, Valentina Boeva·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2024
- MALAT1 expression indicates cell quality in single-cell RNA sequencing data
Zoe A. Clarke, Gary D. Bader·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2024
- Comprehensive generation, visualization, and reporting of quality control metrics for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Rui Hong, Yusuke Koga, … Joshua David Campbell·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2022