bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Stochastic characterization of navigation strategies in an automated variant of the Barnes maze
Abstract
Animals can use a repertoire of strategies to navigate in an environment, and it remains an intriguing question how these strategies are selected based on the nature and familiarity of environments. To investigate this question, we developed a fully automated variant of the Barnes maze, characterized by 24 vestibules distributed along the periphery of a circular arena, and monitored the trajectories of mice over 15 days as they learned to navigate towards a goal vestibule from a random start vestibule. We show that the patterns of vestibule visits can be reproduced by the combination of three stochastic processes reminiscent of random, serial and spatial strategies. The processes randomly selected vestibules based on either uniform (random) or biased (serial and spatial) probability distributions. They closely matched experimental data across a range of statistical distributions characterizing the length, distribution, step size, direction, and stereotypy of vestibule sequences, revealing a shift from random to spatial and serial strategies over time, with a strategy switch occurring approximately every six vestibule visits. Our study provides a novel apparatus and analysis toolset for tracking the repertoire of navigation strategies and demonstrates that a set of stochastic processes can largely account for exploration patterns in the Barnes maze.
- organism: mouse
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: trajectory inference
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Schema-induced shifts in mice navigational strategies are unveiled by a minimal behavioral model of spatial exploration.
Christina-Anna Vallianatou, Alejandra Alonso, … Federico Stella·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2021
- Composing trajectories for rapid inference of navigational goals
Nada Y. Abdelrahman, Wan-chen Jiang, … Ann M. Hermundstad·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2026
- Structured navigation emerges from self-guided spatial learning in freely moving common marmosets
Nada El Mahmoudi, Francesca Lanzarini, … Jean Laurens·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2025
- Renovating the Barnes maze for mouse models of Dementia with STARR FIELD: A 4-day protocol for learning rate, retention and cognitive flexibility.
Aimee X. Bertolli, Oday Halhouli, … Georgina M. Aldridge·MethodsPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2026
- Two complementary circuits for spatial navigation in mouse: evidence from Fos mapping
Edyta Balcerek, Urszula Włodkowska, Rafał Czajkowski·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2023
- Random searchers cope with cognitive errors and uncertainty better than path planners
D. Campos, F. Bartumeus, … J. Cristin·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2020