Efficient quantification of lipid packing defect sensing by amphipathic peptides; comparing Martini 2 & 3 with CHARMM36
Abstract
In biological systems, proteins can be attracted to curved or stretched regions of lipid bilayers by sensing hydrophobic defects in the lipid packing on the membrane surface. Here, we present an efficient end-state free energy calculation method to quantify such sensing in molecular dynamics simulations. We illustrate that lipid packing defect sensing can be defined as the difference in mechanical work required to stretch a membrane with and without a peptide bound to the surface. We also demonstrate that a peptides ability to concurrently induce excess leaflet area (tension) and elastic softening - a property we call the characteristic area of sensing (CHAOS) - and lipid packing sensing behavior are in fact two sides of the same coin. In essence, defect sensing displays a peptides propensity to generate tension. The here-proposed mechanical pathway is equally accurate yet, computationally, about 40 times less costly than the commonly used alchemical pathway (thermodynamic integration), allowing for more feasible free energy calculations in atomistic simulations. This enabled us to directly compare the Martini 2 and 3 coarse-grained and the CHARMM36 atomistic force-fields in terms of relative binding free energies for six representative peptides including the curvature sensor ALPS and two antiviral amphipathic helices (AH). We observed that Martini 3 qualitatively reproduces experimental trends, whilst producing substantially lower (relative) binding free energies and shallower membrane insertion depths compared to atomistic simulations. In contrast, Martini 2 tends to overestimate (relative) binding free energies. Finally, we offer a glimpse into how our end-state based free energy method can enable the inverse design of optimal lipid packing defect sensing peptides when used in conjunction with our recently developed Evolutionary Molecular Dynamics (Evo-MD) method. We argue that these optimized defect sensors - aside from their biomedical and biophysical relevance - can provide valuable targets for the development of lipid force-fields. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/482978v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1872c25org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1635f0eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f5ad91org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@156209f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Feedback between membrane tension, lipid shape and curvature in the formation of packing defects
M. Pinot, S. Vanni, … J.-B. Manneville·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2018
- Predicting protein curvature sensing across membrane compositions with a bilayer continuum model
Yiben Fu, David H. Johnson, … Margaret E. Johnson·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2026
- Charge distribution and helical content tune the binding of septins amphipathic helix domain to lipid membranes
C. J. Edelmaier, Stephen J. Klawa, … Ehssan Nazockdast·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2025
- Physics-based generative model of curvature sensing peptides; distinguishing sensors from binders
N. van Hilten, J. Methorst, … H. J. Risselada·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2022
- 3D Packing Defects in Lipid Membrane as a Function of Membrane Order
Madhusmita Tripathy, Anand Srivastava·bioRxiv·May 7, 2019
- Lipid Defect Analyzer (LipiDeA): A Python Framework for Quantifying Lipid Packing Defects in Curved and Neutral Lipid-Containing Membranes
Arvin Nazari, Yu‐ming M. Huang·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2026