Sign in
NeuroscienceChemical Senses
Peer-reviewed journal article

Odor-evoked respiratory responses throughout development in sighted and blind mice

Nouhaila Bouguiyoud, Philippe LitaudoniD, Johannes FrasnelliiD, Samuel GarciaiD, Belkacem Messaoudi, Anne‐Marie MoulyiD, Syrina Al Aïn, Emmanuelle CourtioliD

Abstract

Congenital blindness affects olfactory function depending on developmental stage. However, when studying the ontogeny of olfactory abilities, not all behaviors are expressed at every age making the longitudinal comparisons difficult. Odor-evoked respiratory responses, which are unlearned and do not require complex motor coordination, may serve as sensitive measures of olfactory abilities throughout ontogeny. Using a non-invasive measure of respiration in an olfactory perceptual paradigm, we assessed odor-evoked respiratory responses in a model of congenital blindness at 3 ages, infant, juvenile and adult, in the same mice and in both males and females. We demonstrated the differential outcome of two respiratory parameters (i.e. frequency and amplitude) in a mouse model of congenital blindness. We showed that blind mice have similar olfactory abilities than sighted mice throughout ontogeny but display enhanced sniffing frequency and amplitude, starting at the juvenile age for the latter one, that may help them better explore their environment. We also demonstrated that respiratory frequency is a robust index of age and of olfactory detection, habituation and discrimination at all ages. On the other side, respiratory amplitude does not provide a proxy of olfactory performance at all ages, however, it does highlight differences between sexes and phenotypes associated with visual deprivation. To conclude, our data highlight that respiratory parameters can be used as a complementary approach to assess olfactory performance throughout development and provide an index of olfactory plasticity.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
0.63
Field percentile
top 39%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBoulanger-B '22Landry '22Mahajan '25Peter '20Rekow '24Si '24
76% semantic matchNeuroscience