Fast processing of environmental DNA metabarcoding sequence data using convolutional neural networks
Benjamin FlückiD, Laëtitia MathoniD, Stéphanie ManeliD, Alice ValentiniiD, Tony DéjeaniD, Camille P. AlbouyiD, David MouillotiD, Wilfried ThuilleriD, Jérôme MurienneiD, Sébastien BrosseiD, Loïc PellissieriD
Abstract
1The intensification of anthropogenic pressures have increased consequences on biodiversity and ultimately on the functioning of ecosystems. To monitor and better understand biodiversity responses to environmental changes using standardized and reproducible methods, novel high-throughput DNA sequencing is becoming a major tool. Indeed, organisms shed DNA traces in their environment and this "environmental DNA" (eDNA) can be collected and sequenced using eDNA metabarcoding. The processing of large volumes of eDNA metabarcoding data remains challenging, especially its transformation to relevant taxonomic lists that can be interpreted by experts. Speed and accuracy are two major bottlenecks in this critical step. Here, we investigate whether convolutional neural networks (CNN) can optimize the processing of short eDNA sequences. We tested whether the speed and accuracy of a CNN are comparable to that of the frequently used OBITools bioinformatic pipeline. We applied the methodology on a massive eDNA dataset collected in Tropical South America (French Guiana), where freshwater fishes were targeted using a small region (60pb) of the 12S ribosomal RNA mitochondrial gene. We found that the taxonomic assignments from the CNN were comparable to those of OBITools, with high correlation levels and a similar match to the regional fish fauna. The CNN allowed the processing of raw fastq files at a rate of approximately 1 million sequences per minute which was 150 times faster than with OBITools. Once trained, the application of CNN to new eDNA metabarcoding data can be automated, which promises fast and easy deployment on the cloud for future eDNA analyses.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On-site metabarcoding analysis of environmental DNA samples
Quentin Mauvisseau, Isabelle Ewers, … Jonathan Stuart Ready·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- An efficient early-pooling protocol for environmental DNA metabarcoding
M. Ushio, S. Furukawa, … A. J. Nagano·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2022
- Environmental DNA analysis needs local reference data to inform taxonomy-based conservation policy:A case study from Aotearoa / New Zealand
P. Czechowski, M. de Lange, … M. Knapp·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2021
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems
J. M. Jackman, C. Benvenuto, … N. G. Sales·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2021
- A sample-to-identification workflow to monitor animal and plant biodiversity using metabarcoding and real time analysis
Lucas Esteban Wange, Javier Prado-Martinez, … Esther Lizano·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2026
- eDNA metabarcoding provides scalable and continuous biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026