eDNA metabarcoding provides scalable and continuous biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life
Till‐Hendrik MacheriD, Robin SchütziD, Jens Arle, Arne J. BeermanniD, Peter HaaseiD, Jan KoschorreckiD, Henrik KrehenwinkeliD, Demetrio MoraiD, James S. SinclairiD, Jonas ZimmermanniD, Florian LeeseiD
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has the potential to substantially expand our knowledge of global biodiversity beyond that provided by conventional approaches. However, the degree to which eDNA data provides real ecological insight, rather than primarily reflecting environmental factors that affect eDNA shedding and degradation, remains unclear. Additional uncertainties arise in terms of cost-effectiveness and whether the price is worth any extra biodiversity information that is gleaned. Here, we established a high-resolution, bi-weekly eDNA time-series in Germany across aquatic and riparian habitats to quantify seasonal biodiversity dynamics, to relate eDNA to different potential environmental drivers, and to parametrize cost estimates. Over one year, eDNA metabarcoding detected more than 1,000 species across multiple trophic levels and primarily revealed real, taxon-specific seasonal patterns, in addition to some relationships to water temperature, discharge, and conductivity. Compared to historical records dating back to 1891, year-round eDNA monitoring increased reported species numbers by 2.4-fold for invertebrates, 2.2-fold for mammals, 1.7-fold for diatoms, 1.2-fold for fish and lamprey, and 1.03-fold for birds. Cumulative biodiversity estimates increased strongly with sampling frequency, demonstrating the value of eDNA for high-frequency time-series monitoring. Moreover, eDNA monitoring was highly cost-effective, providing more than twice the biodiversity information of many conventional surveys for one-sixth the cost, enabling scalable, high-resolution freshwater biodiversity assessments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 7th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantitative monitoring of multispecies fish environmental DNA using high-throughput sequencing
M. Ushio, H. Murakami, … M. Kondoh·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2017
- Simultaneously monitoring aquatic and riparian biodiversity using riverine water eDNA
- Unraveling long-term trends and drivers of fish biodiversity change using environmental DNA metabarcoding of archived samples
Robin Schütz, Martin Friedrichs‐Manthey, … Florian Leese·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2025
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding as an effective and rapid tool for fish monitoring in canals
A. D. McDevitt, N. Guimaraes Sales, … C. Benvenuto·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2018
- Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2021
- Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
Cristina Di Muri, Lori Lawson Handley, … Bernd Hänfling·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2020