Current BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Attention capture outside the oculomotor range
Abstract
Neurophysiological studies demonstrated that attentional orienting is performed by fronto-parietal brain areas which also play an important role in oculomotor control. Accordingly, several studies claimed that exogenous attention can only be allocated to where we can potentially make an eye movement, i.e. within the oculomotor range. We tested this assumption by assessing the disruptive effect of a salient distractor at locations within and beyond participants oculomotor range. Participants rotated their heads ~38{degrees} leftwards to prevent them from performing large rightward saccades. In this posture, participants fixated the screen center and focused their attention on a location on the left side of the screen, where they had to discriminate the orientation of a visual noise patch. While assessing visual orientation sensitivity - an established proxy of visual attention - at this endogenously attended location, we flashed a salient cue either at the attended location or at various locations inside or outside their oculomotor range. We found that whenever the salient cue occurred at a location other than the endogenously attended location, it withdrew visual attention and significantly disrupted endogenous attentional orienting. Crucially, this effect occurred regardless of whether the cue was presented within or beyond participants oculomotor range, demonstrating that exogenous events equally grab our attention both inside and outside the eyes reach. Since spatial exogenous attention was attracted unrestrictedly toward locations to which no saccade could be executed, the coupling of attention and eye movement control is less tight than, for example, the prominent "Premotor Theory of Attention" suggests. Rather, attention can be shifted freely over the entire visual range, independent of pathological and physiological limitations of the eye movement system.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cross-modal orienting of exogenous attention results in visual-cortical facilitation, not suppression
Jonathan Keefe, Emilia Pokta, Viola S. Störmer·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 13, 2021
- Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex
Laura Dugué, Elisha P. Merriam, … Marisa Carrasco·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2020
- Shared neurophysiological resources between exogenous and endogenous visuospatial attentional processes
Mathieu Landry, Jason da Silva Castanheira, … Amir Raz·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2022
- Suppression of alpha-band power underlies exogenous attention to emotional distractors
Lydia Arana, María Melcón, … Almudena Capilla·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2022
- Visual attention is not always spatially coupled to subsequent oculomotor program
Luca Wollenberg, Heiner Deubel, Martin Szinte·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2018
- Same bi-directional modulation of contrast appearance for voluntary presaccadic attention and involuntary exogenous attention
Tianyu Zhang, Yong‐Chun Cai·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2025