Concurrent Guidance of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Items: Behavioral and Computational Evidence
Abstract
During visual search, task-relevant representations in visual working memory (VWM), known as attentional templates, are assumed to guide attention. A current debate concerns whether only one (Single-Item-Template hypothesis, or SIT) or multiple (Multiple-Item-Template hypothesis, or MIT) items can serve as attentional templates simultaneously. The current study was designed to test these two hypotheses. Participants memorized two colors, prior to a visual-search task in which the target and the distractor could match or not match the colors held in VWM. Robust attentional guidance was observed when one of the memory colors was presented as the target (reduced response times [RTs] on target-match trials) or the distractor (increased RTs on distractor-match trials). We constructed two drift-diffusion models that implemented the MIT and SIT hypotheses, which are similar in their predictions about overall RTs, but differ in their predictions about RTs on individual trials. Critically, simulated RT distributions and error rates revealed a better match of the MIT hypothesis to the observed data than the SIT hypothesis. Taken together, our findings provide behavioral and computational evidence for the concurrent guidance of attention by multiple items in VWM. Significance statementTheories differ in how many items within visual working memory can guide attention at the same time. This question is difficult to address, because multiple- and single-item-template theories make very similar predictions about average response times. Here we use drift-diffusion modeling in addition to behavioral data, to model response times at an individual level. Crucially, we find that our model of the multiple-item-template theory predicts human behavior much better than our model of the single-item-template theory; that is, modeling of behavioral data provides compelling evidence for multiple attentional templates that are simultaneously active.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016)
Marcella Frătescu, Dirk van Moorselaar, Sebastiaan Mathôt·Attention Perception & PsychophysicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2019
- Visual Working Memory Guides Attention Rhythmically
Jiachen Lu, Yaochun Cai, Xilin Zhang·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2025
- Eye movements in real-life search are guided by task-irrelevant working-memory content
Cherie Zhou, Monicque M. Lorist, Sebastiaan Mathôt·bioRxiv·May 18, 2020
- The Two Lives of Visual Working Memory: Evidence for Distinct Conscious and Unconscious Representations.
Aleksandra Lipińska, Kinga Ciupińska, Renate Rutiku·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- Concurrent maintenance of visual imagery and short-term memory provides evidence for their distinct representations
Elyana Saad, Juha Silvanto·bioRxiv·May 7, 2024
- Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory
Valerie M. Beck, Timothy J. Vickery·CortexPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2018