Gap perception in bumblebees
S. Ravi, O. Bertrand, T. Siesenop, L.-S. Manz, C. Doussot, A. Fisher, M. Egelhaaf
Abstract
A number of insects fly over long distances below the natural canopy where the physical environment is highly cluttered consisting of obstacles of varying shape, size and texture. While navigating within such environments animals need to perceive and disambiguate environmental features that might obstruct their flight. The most elemental aspect of aerial navigation through such environments is gap identification and passability evaluation. We used bumblebees to seek insights into the mechanisms used for gap identification when confronted with an obstacle in their flight path and behavioral compensations employed to assess gap properties. Initially, bumblebee foragers were trained to fly though an unobstructed flight tunnel that led to a foraging chamber. After the bees were familiar with this situation, we placed a wall containing a gap that unexpectedly obstructed the flight path on a return trip to the hive. The flight trajectories of the bees as they approached the obstacle wall and traversed the gap were analyzed in order to evaluate their behavior as a function of the distance between the gap and a background wall that was placed behind the gap. Bumblebees initially decelerate when confronted with an unexpected obstacle. Deceleration was first noticed when the obstacle subtended around 35{degrees} on the retina but also depended on the properties of the gap. Subsequently the bees gradually traded off their longitudinal velocity to lateral velocity and approached the gap increasing lateral displacements and lateral velocity. Bumblebees shaped their flight trajectory depending on the salience of the gap, in our case, indicated by the optic flow contrast between the region within the gap and on the obstacle, which increases with decreasing distance between the gap and the background wall. As the optic flow contrast decreased the bees spent increasing time moving laterally across the obstacles. During these repeated lateral maneuvers the bees are likely assessing gap geometry and passability.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Wind and route choice affect performance of bees flying above versus within a cluttered obstacle field
N. Burnett, M. Badger, S. Combes·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2021
- Navigating in clutter: How bumblebees optimize flight behaviour through experience
Manon Jeschke, Maximilian Stahlsmeier, … Olivier J. N. Bertrand·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2025
- Zebra finches use brightness cues for gap selection in flight
E. Borsier, G. K. Taylor·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2023
- Taking a semi-local dynamic snapshot as a possibility for local homing in initially naive bumblebees
A. Lobecke, R. Kern, M. Egelhaaf·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2017
- Close encounters of three kinds: impacts of leg, wing, and body collisions on flight performance in carpenter bees
N. Burnett, S. Combes·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2023
- Approach direction prior to landing explains patterns of colour learning in bees
K. V. Langridge, C. Wilke, … N. Hempel de Ibarra·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2018