NeuronNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Neuronal circuitry for stimulus selection in the visual system
António M. FernandesiD, Duncan S MearnsiD, Joseph C. DonovaniD, Johannes LarschiD, Thomas O. Helmbrecht, Yvonne KölschiD, Eva Laurell, Koichi KawakamiiD, Marco Dal MaschioiD, Herwig BaieriD
Abstract
Visual objects naturally compete for the brains attention, and selecting just one of them for a behavioural response is often crucial for the animals survival1. The neural correlate of such stimulus prioritisation might take the form of a saliency map by which responses to one target are enhanced relative to distractors in other parts of the visual field2. Single-cell responses consistent with this type of computation have been observed in the tectum of primates, birds, turtles and lamprey2-7. However, the exact circuit implementation has remained unclear. Here we investigated the underlying neuronal mechanism presenting larval zebrafish with two simultaneous looming stimuli, each of which was able to trigger directed escapes on their own. Behaviour tracking revealed that the fish respond to these competing stimuli predominantly with a winner-take-all strategy. Using brain-wide functional recordings, we discovered neurons in the tectum whose responses to the target stimulus were non-linearly modulated by the saliency of the distractor. When the two stimuli were presented monocularly in different positions of the visual field, stimulus selection was already apparent in the activity of retinal ganglion cell axons, a likely consequence of antagonistic mechanisms operating outside the classical receptive field8,9. When the two stimuli were presented binocularly, i.e., on opposite sides of the fish, our analysis indicates that a loop involving excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the nucleus isthmi (NI) and the tectum weighed stimulus saliencies across hemispheres. Consistent with focal enhancement and global suppression, glutamatergic NI cells branch locally in the tectum, whereas GABAergic NI cells project broadly across both tectal hemispheres. Moreover, holographic optogenetic stimulation confirmed that glutamatergic NI neurons can modulate visual responses in the tectum. Together, our study shows, for the first time, context-dependent contributions of retinotectal and isthmotectal circuits to the computation of the visual saliency map, a prerequisite for stimulus-driven, bottom-up attention.
- organism: zebrafish
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 71
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Preference-Independent Encoding of Visual SaliencyWithin but Not Cross Features in the Mouse SuperiorColliculus
Ruixiang Wu, Jinhuai Xu, … Ya-tang Li·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2025
- Topographically localised modulation of tectal cell spatial tuning by natural scenes
Thomas T. J. Sainsbury, Giovanni Diana, Martin P. Meyer·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2021
- Phase of neural oscillations as a reference frame for attention-based routing in visual cortex
E. Aboutorabi, S. Baloni Ray, … M. Esghaei·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2021
- Neuronal correlates of attentional selectivity and intensity in visual area V4 are invariant of motivational context
Supriya Ghosh, John H. R. Maunsell·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2021
- Superimposed inhibitory surrounds underlying Saliency-based Stimulus Selection in avian Midbrain isthmi pars magnocellularis
Longlong Qian, Chongchong Jia, … Songwei Wang·Integrative ZoologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2025
- Cellular resolution imaging of vestibular processing across the larval zebrafish brain
Itia A. Favre‐Bulle, Gilles Claude Vanwalleghem, … Ethan K. Scott·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2018