Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Abstract
Survival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in todays highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid 4 to 5 years from the first R01 award. The factors associated with a high risk of dropping out, and whether these factors impact all junior investigators equally, are unclear. We identified a cohort of 1,496 investigators who received their first R01-equivalent (R01-e) awards from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases between 2003 and 2010, and studied all their subsequent NIH grant applications through 2016. Ultimately, 57% of the cohort were successful in obtaining new R01-e funding, despite highly competitive conditions. Among those investigators who failed to compete successfully for new funding (43%), the average time to dropping out was 5 years. Investigators who successfully obtained new grants showed remarkable within-person consistency across multiple grant submission behaviors, including submitting more applications per year, more renewal applications, and more applications to multiple NIH Institutes. Funded investigators appeared to have two advantages over their unfunded peers at the outset: they had better scores on their first R01-e grants and they demonstrated an early ability to write applications that would be scored, not triaged. The cohort rapidly segregated into two very different groups on the basis of PI consistency in the quality and frequency of applications submitted after their first R01-e award. Lastly, we identified a number of specific demographic factors, intitutional characteristics, and grant submission behaviors that were associated with successful outcomes, and assessed their predictive value and relative importance for the likelihood of obtaining additional NIH funding.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- National Institutes of Health Institute and Center Award Rates and Funding Disparities
M. S. Lauer, J. Doyle, … D. Roychowdhury·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2020
- Analysis of NIH K99/R00 Awards and the Career Progression of Awardees
N. C. Woitowich, S. R. Hengel, … D. J. Tyrrell·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2023
- Inequalities in the Distribution of National Institutes of Health Research Project Grant Funding
M. S. Lauer, D. Roychowdhury·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2021
- Absolute and Relative Declines in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funded Basic Science Publications
Michael S. Lauer·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2025
- Modeling Research Project Grant Success Rates from NIH Appropriation History: Extension to 2020
J. Berg·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2020
- High cost of bias: Diminishing marginal returns on NIH grant funding to institutions
Wayne P. Wahls·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2018