Mining association rules for targeted spatiotemporal aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling
Nikolett TothiD, Luiza AntonieiD, Robert HanneriD, Daniel J. GillisiD, Jarrett D. PhillipsiD
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a non-invasive alternative to traditional, more destructive sampling methods for determining species occupancy at ecological sites of interest. Aquatic eDNA sampling entails filtering a known volume of water to capture and detect genetic material shed by organisms. While the influence of individual environmental properties on the presence of target eDNA has been widely studied, it remains unclear how variables like temperature, pH, flow rate and conductivity correlate collectively with site electrofishing counts and eDNA concentrations. Resolving this question is important for two reasons: (1) typically, only eDNA, not physical specimens, is collected and measured, and (2) when methods like electrofishing and eDNA sampling are used in tandem, results often differ. Here unsupervised association rule-based machine learning is employed to discover interesting relationships among sampled covariates within a previously published case study of native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) collected from Hanlon Creek (Guelph, Ontario, Canada) in September 2019. From a dataset of only 126 observations, the mining process revealed over 12000 plausible association rules linking covariates to eDNA concentrations (low/high) and electrofishing outcomes (absence/presence of brook trout). A strict pruning strategy reduced this ruleset to a manageable size of 153 associations, some of which were corroborated by existing literature, and some of which were novel (such as those potentially relating electrical conductivity to microbial and enzymatic activity). The entire workflow is included as a new R package called RulesTools. These results highlight the promise of association rule mining as a tool for guiding eDNA metadata collection, complementing statistical modelling, and informing conservation and management decision-making.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Influence of Preservation Methods, Sample Medium and Sampling Time on eDNA Recovery in a Neotropical River
Naiara Guimarães Sales, Owen Simon Wangensteen, … Stefano Mariani·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2019
- Fish from the sky: Airborne eDNA tracks aquatic life
Yin Cheong Aden Ip, Gledis Guri, … Ryan P. Kelly·bioRxiv·May 25, 2025
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling strategies influence estimates of freshwater fish eDNA concentrations.
Marine Vautier, Jonas Bylemans, … Isabelle Domaizon·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2025
- Evaluating eDNA Detection from Live and Dead Control Sources
Scott M. Blankenship, Cheryl Dean, … Gregory Schumer·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2026
- How to design optimal eDNA sampling strategies for biomonitoring in river networks
L. Carraro, J. B. Stauffer, F. Altermatt·bioRxiv·May 18, 2020
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding as an effective and rapid tool for fish monitoring in canals
A. D. McDevitt, N. Guimaraes Sales, … C. Benvenuto·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2018