SAGE Open MedicineNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Vibrotactile perception in the sole of the foot in people with normal glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes
Magnus PetersoniD, Ronnie PingeliD, Olov RolandssoniD, Lars Bertil DahliniD
Abstract
AimTo evaluate vibrotactile perception thresholds in people with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in relation to other sensory tests. MethodsNerve function was evaluated in 36 and 42 participants with NGT and T2DM, respectively [mean age 70.0 (1.2) years; males n=40, females n=38]. The mean duration of T2DM was 12.3 (7.3) years. Vibration perception thresholds were measured at four frequencies (8, 16, 32 and 125 Hz) bilaterally on the sole of the foot at first and fifth metatarsal heads using Multifrequency vibrametry and compared to vibration perception thresholds using Biothesiometer (128 Hz) bilaterally (medial malleolus and distal dorsal bony surface of great toes), touch sensation with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament bilaterally (10 g) at three sites on the sole of foot (distal great toe and 1st and 5th metatarsal heads), electrophysiology (amplitude and conduction velocity of sural nerve; right side) and thermal sensory testing (i.e. small diameter nerve fibers; method of limits using Thermotest(R)). ResultsVibration perception and temperature thresholds in the foot and sural nerve function were different between the NGT and T2DM categories. Measuring vibration perception thresholds at lower frequencies with Multifrequency vibrametry, compared to Biothesiometer, both provided similar correlations to the amplitude of the sural nerve. Temperature thresholds did also correlate with vibration perception thresholds and with sural nerve function. Only 4/42 participants with T2DM showed pathology by monofilament test, none with NGT. ConclusionsVibration perception thresholds have a fair correlation to amplitude of the sural nerve, even when measured at a non-tactile surface. Thus in the present study, measuring vibration perception threshold at a tactile surface does not seem to provide any clear advantage over the traditional way of measuring vibration perception on the medial malleolus. In people with T2DM, both large and small diameter nerve fibers seem to be affected.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Field percentile
- top 25%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sex-dependent Aβ RA-Low threshold mechanoreceptors alteration in diabetic conditions
Guillaume Rastoldo, Ali K. Jaafar, … Steeve Bourane·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2026
- Overground gait adaptability in older adults with diabetes in response to virtual targets and physical obstacles
S. Martin, S. B. Taylor, … R. Begg·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2022
- Perceiving less or perceiving unreliably? Disentangling thermosensory sensitivity and precision in the contexts of ageing and neuropathy
Arthur S. Courtin, Camilla E. Krænge, … Francesca Fardo·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2025
- Impact of type 2 diabetes on cardiorespiratory function and exercise performance
Joanie Caron, Gregory R duManoir, … Patrice Brassard·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2016
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Sensory Neurons in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Reveals Inflammation and Neuronal Loss
Bradford E. Hall, Emma Macdonald, … Ashok B. Kulkarni·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2022
- Does Vibrotactile Stimulation of the Auricular Vagus Nerve Enhance Working Memory? A Behavioral and Physiological Investigation
Gansheng Tan, Josh Adams, … Eric C. Leuthardt·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2024