Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The neural circuitry underlying the "rhythm effect" in stuttering
Saul A. FrankfordiD, Elizabeth S. Heller MurrayiD, Matthew MasapolloiD, Shanqing CaiiD, Jason A. TourvilleiD, Alfonso Nieto-CastañóniD, Frank H. GuentheriD
Abstract
PurposeStuttering is characterized by intermittent speech disfluencies which are dramatically reduced when speakers synchronize their speech with a steady beat. The goal of this study was to characterize the neural underpinnings of this phenomenon using functional magnetic resonance imaging. MethodData were collected from 17 adults who stutter and 17 adults who do not stutter while they read sentences aloud either in a normal, self-paced fashion or paced by the beat of a series of isochronous tones ("rhythmic"). Task activation and task-based functional connectivity analyses were carried out to compare neural responses between speaking conditions and groups. ResultsAdults who stutter produced fewer disfluent trials in the rhythmic condition than in the normal condition. While adults who do not stutter had greater activation in the rhythmic condition compared to the normal condition in regions associated with speech planning, auditory feedback control, and timing perception, adults who stutter did not have any significant changes. However, adults who stutter demonstrated increased functional connectivity between bilateral inferior cerebellum and bilateral orbitofrontal cortex as well as increased connectivity among cerebellar regions during rhythmic speech as compared to normal speech. ConclusionModulation of connectivity in the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex during rhythmic speech suggests that this fluency-inducing technique activates a compensatory timing system in the cerebellum and potentially modulates top-down motor control and attentional systems. These findings corroborate previous work associating the cerebellum with fluency in adults who stutter and indicate that the cerebellum may be targeted to enhance future therapeutic interventions.
- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fluency shaping increases integration of the command-to-execution and the auditory-to-motor pathways in persistent developmental stuttering
Alexandra Korzeczek, Annika Primaßin, … Nicole Eva Neef·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 16, 2021
- Neural oscillatory activity and connectivity in children who stutter during a non-speech motor task
Valeria C. Caruso, Amanda Hampton Wray, … Soo‐Eun Chang·Journal of Neurodevelopmental DisordersPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2023
- Does over-reliance on auditory feedback cause disfluency? An fMRI study of induced fluency in people who stutter.
Sophie Meekings, Kyle M. Jasmin, … Sophie Kerttu Scott·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Reactive Inhibitory Control Precedes Overt Stuttering Events
Joan Orpella, Graham Flick, … Eric S. Jackson·Neurobiology of LanguagePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Cortical tracking of speech is reduced in adults who stutter when listening for speaking
Simone Gastaldon, Pierpaolo Busan, … Mikel Lizarazu·Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2024
- Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter
Jennifer Chesters, Riikka Möttönen, Kate Emma Watkins·BrainPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2018