NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Fluency shaping increases integration of the command-to-execution and the auditory-to-motor pathways in persistent developmental stuttering
Alexandra Korzeczek, Annika PrimaßiniD, Alexander Wolff von GudenbergiD, Peter DechentiD, Walter PaulusiD, Martin SommeriD, Nicole Eva NeefiD
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Abstract
Fluency-shaping enhances the speech fluency of persons who stutter, yet underlying conditions and neuroplasticity-related mechanisms are largely unknown. While speech production-related brain activity in stuttering is well studied, it is unclear whether therapy repairs networks of altered sensorimotor integration, imprecise neural timing and sequencing, faulty error monitoring, or insufficient speech planning. Here, we tested the impact of one-year fluency-shaping therapy on resting-state fMRI connectivity within sets of brain regions subserving these speech functions. We analyzed resting-state data of 22 patients who participated in a fluency-shaping program, 18 patients not participating in therapy, and 28 fluent control participants, measured one year apart. Improved fluency was accompanied by an increased synchronization within the sensorimotor integration network. Specifically, two connections were strengthened; the left inferior frontal gyrus showed increased connectivity with the precentral gyrus at the representation of the left laryngeal motor cortex, and the left inferior frontal gyrus showed increased connectivity with the right superior temporal gyrus. Thus, therapy-associated neural remediation was based on a strengthened integration of the command-to-execution pathway together with an increased auditory-to-motor coupling. Since we investigated task-free brain activity, we assume that our findings are not biased to network activity involved in compensation but represent long-term focal neuroplasticity effects.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The neural circuitry underlying the "rhythm effect" in stuttering
Saul A. Frankford, Elizabeth S. Heller Murray, … Frank H. Guenther·Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2021
- Two cortical representations of voice control are differentially involved in speech fluency
Nicole Eva Neef, Annika Primaßin, … Martin Sommer·Brain CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2021
- Does over-reliance on auditory feedback cause disfluency? An fMRI study of induced fluency in people who stutter.
Sophie Meekings, Kyle M. Jasmin, … Sophie Kerttu Scott·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter
Jennifer Chesters, Riikka Möttönen, Kate Emma Watkins·BrainPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2018
- EEG responses to auditory cues predict fluency variability and stuttering intervention outcome
Mónica Soares Rocha, Jaqueline Carmona, João Correia·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2025
- Differences in brain activity during sentence repetition in people who stutter: a combined analysis of four fMRI studies
Birtan Demirel, Jennifer Chesters, … Kate Emma Watkins·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2025