Sign in
NeuroscienceBrain stimulation
Peer-reviewed journal article

Effects of stimulus pulse rate on somatosensory adaptation in the human cortex

Christopher L. HughesiD, Sharlene N. FlesheriD, Robert A. GauntiD

Abstract

BackgroundIntracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the somatosensory cortex can restore sensation to people with neurological diseases. However, many aspects of ICMS are poorly understood, including the effect of continuous stimulation on percept intensity over time. ObjectiveHere, we evaluate how tactile percepts, evoked by ICMS in the somatosensory cortex of a human participant adapt over time. MethodsWe delivered continuous and intermittent ICMS to the somatosensory cortex and assessed the reported intensity of tactile percepts over time in a human participant. Experiments were conducted across approximately one year and linear mixed effects models were used to assess significance. ResultsContinuous stimulation at high frequencies led to rapid decreases in intensity, while low frequency stimulation maintained percept intensity for longer periods. Burst-modulated stimulation extended the time before the intensity began to decrease, but all protocols ultimately resulted in complete sensation loss within one minute. Intermittent stimulation paradigms with several seconds between stimulus trains also led to decreases in intensity on many electrodes, but never resulted in extinction of sensation after over three minutes of stimulation. Additionally, longer breaks between each pulse train resulted in some recovery of the stimulus-evoked percepts. For several electrodes, intermittent stimulation had almost no effect on the perceived intensity. ConclusionsIntermittent ICMS paradigms were more effective at maintaining percepts, and given that transient activity in the somatosensory cortex dominates the response to object contact, this stimulation method may mimic natural cortical activity and improve the perception of stimulation over time.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
36
FWCI
3.09
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSombeck '22Hughes '21Kumaravelu '24Callier '19Hughes '23Yun '23
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Joseph T Sombeck, Juliet O. Heye, Karthik Kumaravelu+5 more·Journal of Neural Engineering·Apr 1, 2022· 52 citations