Journal of Neural EngineeringNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Defining the impact of deep brain stimulation contact size and shape on neural selectivity
Daria Nesterovich AndersoniD, Alan D. DorvaliD, John David RolstoniD, Stefan M. PulstiD, Collin J. AndersoniD
Abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding neural selectivity is essential for optimizing medical applications of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We previously showed that modulation of the DBS waveform can induce changes in orientation-based selectivity, and that lengthening of DBS pulses or directional segmentation can reduce preferential selectivity for large axons. In this work, we sought to answer a simple, but important question: how do the size and shape of the contact influence neural selectivity? MethodsWe created multicompartment neuron models for several axon diameters and used finite element modeling with standard-sized cylindrical leads to determine the effects on changing contact size and shape on axon activation profiles and volumes of tissue activated. Contacts ranged in size from 0.04 to 16 mm2, compared with a standard size of 6 mm2. ResultsWe found that changes in contact size induce substantial changes in orientation-based selectivity in the context of a cylindrical lead, and rectangular shaping of the contact can alter this selectivity. Smaller contact sizes were more effective in constraining neural activation to small, nearby axons representative of grey matter. However, micro-scale contacts enable only limited spread of neural activation before exceeding standard charge density limitations; further, energetic efficiency is optimized by somewhat larger contacts. InterpretationsSmall-scale contacts are optimal for constraining stimulation in nearby grey matter and avoiding orientation-selective activation. However, given charge density limitations and energy inefficiency of micro-scale contacts, our results suggest that contacts about half the size of those on segmented clinical leads may optimize efficiency and charge density limitation avoidance.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural Selectivity, Efficiency, and Dose Equivalence in Deep Brain Stimulation through Pulse Width Tuning and Segmented Electrodes.
Collin J. Anderson, Daria Nesterovich Anderson, … Alan D. Dorval·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2020
- Impact of Axon Model Complexity on Deep Brain Stimulation: A Comparative Analysis of MRG and Cohen Double-Cable Models
Mohadeseh Nadimi, Anne Rijpma, … Saman Vinke·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026
- A Unified Computational Framework for Deep Brain Stimulation at the Cellular and Network Levels
David Crompton, Luka Milosevic, Milad Lankarany·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2026
- A theoretical framework for the site-specific and frequency-dependent neuronal effects of deep brain stimulation
Luka Milosevic, Suneil Kumar Kalia, … Milad Lankarany·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2021
- Selectivity of Lateral Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation with Varying Electrode Diameters and Stimulation Configurations
Gilgal Justice Ansah, Matteo Del Brocco, … Lee E. Fisher·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- Weak electric fields of deep brain stimulation can entrain spiking in multi-compartment cortical neuron models
Maud Bosman, Nina Doorn, … Bettina C. Schwab·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2026