Supplementing floral resources does not mitigate the negative effects of urbanisation on cavity-nesting bees and wasps.
Abstract
O_LICavity-nesting bees and wasps provide essential ecosystem services such as pollination and pest control. Within urban environments, it is likely that cavity-nesting insects are using greenspaces to forage for food and nesting resources, and thus may benefit from urban greenspace management interventions, such as the addition of flower patches and "bee hotels" (trap nests). C_LIO_LIIn contrast to the relatively large body of work demonstrating the effects of wildflower provisioning on bees in an agricultural context, there have been few studies testing the benefits of floral provisioning, or the relative importance of nest site and food constraints on urban cavity-nesting bees and wasps. Consequently, we lack an empirical evidence base for optimising and informing conservation interventions for these taxa. C_LIO_LITo understand how the addition of floral resources influences cavity-nesting insect communities, we conducted a 2-year study in urban greenspaces used for horticulture (allotments). We manipulated floral and nesting resources by adding nectar-rich flower patches and artificial trap nests, and compared nest colonisation by cavity-nesting bees and wasps in sites with floral additions and where no additions were made. Our sites were configured along an urbanisation gradient, allowing us to examine how surrounding urbanisation influenced these patterns. C_LIO_LIContrary to our predictions, we found no significant difference in trap nest uptake in sites where floral resources were added, compared to control sites. However, cavity-nesting insect abundance showed a 6-fold decrease over our urbanisation gradient. The addition of floral resources did not mitigate the negative effects of urbanisation on cavity-nesting insects. C_LI Synthesis and Applications: Although enhancing floral resources in urban systems is a recognised strategy for conserving key pollinators such as social bees, our findings suggest that this approach alone does not address the challenges faced by cavity-nesting bees or wasps in urban landscapes. Our results suggest that accounting for the diversity of resource requirements and incorporating landscape-scale analysis is essential to ensure local conservation interventions will benefit a diversity of insect communities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Urbanisation drives biodiversity loss, fitness decline and community shifts in cavity-nesting Hymenoptera
Atilla Çelikgil, Lars Henzschel, … Panagiotis Theodorou·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2025
- Nest aggregations of wild bees and apoid wasps in urban pavements: a street life to be promoted in urban planning
G. Noel, V. Van Keymeulen, … F. Francis·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2021
- Soil sanctuaries: Experimental manipulations enhance ground-nesting bee habitat across an urban gradient
Amber Fredenburg, Karen Goodell·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2025
- Experimental wildflower additions increase pollination in urban agroecosystems
Emilie E. Ellis, Jill L. Edmondson, Stuart A. Campbell·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2025
- Pollen DNA reveals urban cavity-nesting bees feed primarily on weeds and frequently nest in urban farms
Katherine J. Turo, Rodney T. Richardson, … Mary M. Gardiner·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2025
- Dancing bees evaluate agricultural forage resources as inferior to central urban land
A. E. Samuelson, R. Schürch, E. Leadbeater·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2019