Hearing ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Incorporating models of subcortical processing improves the ability to predict EEG responses to natural speech
Elsa Lindboom, Aaron R. NidifferiD, Laurel H. CarneyiD, Edmund C. LaloriD
Abstract
The goal of describing how the human brain responds to complex acoustic stimuli has driven auditory neuroscience research for decades. Often, a systems-based approach has been taken, in which neurophysiological responses are modeled based on features of the presented stimulus. This includes a wealth of work modeling electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to complex acoustic stimuli such as speech. Examples of the acoustic features used in such modeling include the amplitude envelope and spectrogram of speech. These models implicitly assume a direct mapping from stimulus representation to cortical activity. However, in reality, the representation of sound is transformed as it passes through early stages of the auditory pathway, such that inputs to the cortex are fundamentally different from the raw audio signal that was presented. Thus, it could be valuable to account for the transformations taking place in lower-order auditory areas, such as the auditory nerve, cochlear nucleus, and inferior colliculus (IC) when predicting cortical responses to complex sounds. Specifically, because IC responses are more similar to cortical inputs than acoustic features derived directly from the audio signal, we hypothesized that linear mappings (temporal response functions; TRFs) fit to the outputs of an IC model would better predict EEG responses to speech stimuli. To this end, we modeled responses to the acoustic stimuli as they passed through the auditory nerve, cochlear nucleus, and inferior colliculus before fitting a TRF to the output of the modeled IC responses. Results showed that using model-IC responses in traditional systems analyses resulted in better predictions of EEG activity than using the envelope or spectrogram of a speech stimulus. Further, it was revealed that model-IC derived TRFs predict different aspects of the EEG than acoustic-feature TRFs, and combining both types of TRF models provides a more accurate prediction of the EEG response.x
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech
Damien Lesenfants, Jonas Vanthornhout, … Tom Francart·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2019
- Predictors for Estimating Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech
Joshua P. Kulasingham, Florine L. Bachmann, … Emina Aličković·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2024
- Adaptive Gain model for predicting auditory brain activity in mice outperforms standard methods for predicting cortical speech tracking in human EEG
Adèle Simon, Adrian N.L. Sahani, … Jennifer F. Linden·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2026
- Dynamic modeling of EEG responses to natural speech reveals earlier processing of predictable words
Jin Dou, Andrew James Anderson, … Edmund C. Lalor·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2025
- Estimating the Explainable Variance of EEG Responses to Natural Speech
Jin Dou, Edmund C. Lalor·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- Generalizable EEG encoding models with naturalistic audiovisual stimuli
Maansi Desai, Jade Holder, … Liberty S. Hamilton·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2021