Lost in translation: the pitfalls of Ensembl Gene annotations between human genome assemblies and their impact on diagnostics
Abstract
BackgroundThe GRCh37 human genome assembly is still widely used in genomics despite the fact an updated human genome assembly (GRCh38) has been available for many years. A particular issue with relevant ramifications for clinical genetics currently is the case of the GRCh37 Ensembl gene annotations which has been archived, and thus not updated, since 2013. These Ensembl GRCh37 gene annotations are just as ubiquitous as the former assembly and are the default gene models used and preferred by the majority of genomic projects internationally. In this study, we highlight the issue of genes with discrepant annotations, that have been recognized as protein coding in the new but not the old assembly. These genes are ignored by all genomic resources that still rely on the archived and outdated gene annotations. Moreover, the majority if not all of these discrepant genes (DGs) are automatically discarded and ignored by all variant prioritization tools that rely on the GRCh37 Ensembl gene annotations. MethodsWe performed bioinformatics analysis identifying Ensembl genes with discrepant annotations between the two most recent human genome assemblies, hg37, hg38, respectively. Clinical and phenotype gene curations have been obtained and compared for this gene set. Furthermore, matching RefSeq transcripts have also been collated and analyzed. ResultsWe found hundreds of genes (N=267) that were reclassified as "protein-coding" in the new hg38 assembly. Notably, 169 of these genes also had a discrepant HGNC gene symbol between the two assemblies. Most genes had RefSeq matches (N=199/267) including all the genes with defined phenotypes in Ensembl genes GRCh38 assembly (N=10). However, many protein-coding genes remain missing from the current known RefSeq gene models (N=68) ConclusionWe found many clinically relevant genes in this group of neglected genes and we anticipate that many more will be found relevant in the future. For these genes, the inaccurate label of "non-protein-coding" hinders the possibility of identifying any causal sequence variants that overlap them. In addition, Important additional annotations such as evolutionary constraint metrics are also not calculated for these genes for the same reason, further relegating them into oblivion.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 10th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- More than 2,500 coding genes in the human reference gene set still have unsettled status
Miguel Maquedano, Daniel Cerdán-Vélez, Michael L. Tress·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2024
- Evaluation of GRCh38 and de novo haploid genome assemblies demonstrates the enduring quality of the reference assembly
Valerie A Schneider, Tina Graves Lindsay, … Deanna M Church·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2017
- Assembly and Annotation of an Ashkenazi Human Reference Genome
Alaina Shumate, Aleksey V. Zimin, … Steven L. Salzberg·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2020
- A reference-quality, fully annotated genome from a Puerto Rican individual
Aleksey V. Zimin, Alaina Shumate, … Steven L. Salzberg·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2021
- Long-read transcriptomics of a diverse human cohort reveals widespread ancestry bias in gene annotation
Pau Clavell-Revelles, Fairlie Reese, … Marta Melé·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2025
- Transcript Assembly and Annotations: Bias and Adjustment
Qimin Zhang, Mingfu Shao·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2023