Intuitive sensorimotor decisions under risk take Newtonian physics into account
Abstract
The success of our interactions with objects in natural tasks depends on generating motor actions, which are subject to sensorimotor variability, the objects physical properties, which are governed by the laws of kinematics, and the costs and benefits associated with the actions outcomes. Therefore, such interactions jointly involve sensorimotor control, intuitive physics, and decision-making under risk. Here, we devised a mixed reality experiment, which allows investigating human behavior involving the interaction of all three of these cognitive faculties. Participants slid pucks to target areas associated with monetary rewards and losses within an immersive, naturalistic virtual environment. In this task, signal-dependent variability inherent in motor control interacts non-linearly with the physical relationships governing objects motion under friction. By systematically testing generative models of behavior incorporating different assumptions about how participants may generate the slides, we find decisive evidence that participants decision under risk readily took their individual motor variability and Newtonian physics into account to gain monetary rewards without relying on trial by trial learning. Author summaryHumans are exceptionally proficient at manipulating objects in natural tasks. This skill requires integrating three cognitive faculties: 1. Sensorimotor-control, subject to inherent uncertainty and variability; 2. Intuitive physical reasoning as object manipulations are subject to physical dynamics; 3. Economic decision-making when actions have outcomes with monetary consequences. Here, we show that in a naturalistic, immersive object manipulation task, human participants plan their movements by taking into account how their sensorimotor variability interacts with the physical dynamics of object manipulation to optimize economic outcomes. Therefore, our findings suggest that in everyday naturalistic interactions with the world, humans can integrate these three cognitive faculties.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics
N. Neupaertl, F. Tatai, C. A. Rothkopf·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2020
- Optimal motor decision-making through competition with opponents
Keiji Ota, Mamoru Tanae, … Ken Takiyama·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2020
- Humans anticipate the consequences of motor control demands when making perceptual decisions between actions
Élise Leroy, Éric Koun, David Thura·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2024
- Risk optimization during ongoing movement: Insights from movement and gaze behavior in throwing
Stephan Zahno, Damian Beck, … Ernst-Joachim Hossner·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2025
- Biomechanical Costs Influence Decisions Made During Ongoing Actions
Cesar Augusto Canaveral, William Lata, … Paul Cisek·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2024
- Learning to act by integrating mental simulations and physical experiments
Ishita Dasgupta, Kevin A. Smith, … Samuel J. Gershman·bioRxiv·May 15, 2018